🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: sci.math.num-analysis
Article #1037

Re: Exploiting Structure of Hamiltonian Matrices

#1037
From: David John Schneider
Date: Fri, 22 Jan 1993 14:28
64 lines
3046 bytes
smith@minerva.harvard.edu (Steven Smith) writes:

>
>   By the way, these papers define the symplectic group to be the group
>   of transformations leaving invariant the form
>	  _      _              _
>	x y  + x y  + . . . + x y
>	 1 1    2 2            n n
>    _                                                                  *
>   (y denotes the complex conjugate of y).  This is really the group SO(n);
>   the symplectic group leaves invariant the form
>
>	x y  + x y  + . . . + x y .
>	 1 1    2 2            n n
>
>   I don't know if this matters to you; they do this because the
>   Hermitian pops up in the (complex) Riccati equation.
>
	Neither of these definitions correspond to the usual definition
	of the invariant form for symplectic groups.  For example,
	Gilmore ("Lie Groups, Lie Algebras, and Some of Their Applications",
	J. Wiley, 1974, chapter 2) defines symplectic groups as those
	which preserve a bilinear antisymmetric form such as:

	x y  - x y  + x y   - x   y  + ...
	 1 n	n 1    2 n-1   n-1 2

	The forms mentioned above by Steve Smith are sesquilinear and 
	bilinear, respectively, and both are symmetric.  

	As mentioned by Steve Smith it may be that the authors are really
	interested in the one of the non-compact groups SO^*(2N) or SU^*(2N), 
	the so-called "embedding groups".  The appearance of these groups 
	is reasonable given the close connection between Hamiltonian dynamics 
	and quaternions.

	Another possibility is that the authors are interested in the 
	intersection of the symplectic group with the unitary or orthogonal 
	group.  In this	case both symmetric and antisymmetric forms appear.
	In fact, these two possibilities are related since maximal 
	compact subgroup of SU^*(2N) is the unitary-symplectic group
	USp(2n), and similar relationship holds between SO^*(2N) and U(N).  
	For more details, see chapter 6 in the book by Gilmore mentioned 
	previously.

	In any event, one should realize that it is the invariance of a 
	given bilinear antisymmetric form which crucial to the definition 
	of a symplectic group.  
			

--

		Dave Schneider 

		University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign 
		Center for Supercomputing Research and Development
		367 Computer and Systems Research Laboratory
		1308 W. Main Street
		Urbana, IL  61801-2307
		MC-264

		phone : (217) 244-0055  
		fax   : (217) 244-1351
		E-mail: schneid@csrd.uiuc.edu
Technical Details
Message-ID: <SCHNEID.93Jan22142801@sp94.csrd.uiuc.edu>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!usc!sdd.hp.com!ux1.cso.uiuc.edu!csrd.uiuc.edu!s4.csrd.uiuc.edu!schneid
References: <1jo3i5INNnru@nyquist.usc.edu> <SMITH.93Jan22084422@minerva.harvard.edu>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: sci.math.num-analysis
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!usc!sdd.hp.com!ux1.cso.uiuc.edu!csrd.uiuc.edu!s4.csrd.uiuc.edu!schneid
From: schneid@sp94.csrd.uiuc.edu (David John Schneider)
Subject: Re: Exploiting Structure of Hamiltonian Matrices
In-Reply-To: smith@minerva.harvard.edu's message of 22 Jan 93 13:44:22 GMT
Message-ID: <SCHNEID.93Jan22142801@sp94.csrd.uiuc.edu>
Sender: news@csrd.uiuc.edu
Organization: Univ. of Ill. Center for Supercomputing R&D
References: <1jo3i5INNnru@nyquist.usc.edu>
 <SMITH.93Jan22084422@minerva.harvard.edu>
Date: 22 Jan 93 14:28:01
Lines: 64