Article View: sci.math.num-analysis
Article #1102Re: need references for Runge-Kutta versus Multi-step ...
From: Mike Hosea
Date: Tue, 26 Jan 1993 16:33
Date: Tue, 26 Jan 1993 16:33
27 lines
1689 bytes
1689 bytes
In article <1993Jan25.180439.26879@fys.ruu.nl> walsteyn@fys.ruu.nl (Fred Walsteijn) writes: >Dear colleagues, > >I am looking for some recent references comparing >the efficiencies of Runge-Kutta and Multistep methods. >... >Can you give me some references where the efficiencies >of those schemes are compared thoroughly ? > I have just written a paper with Larry Shampine on theoretical efficiency comparisons of Runge-Kutta, multistep, and extrapolation methods. As you know, efficiency comparisons are ordinarily carried out as numerical case studies, but these can be misleading because they are based on particular implementations of the methods and a small set of test problems. The method we present for theoretical efficiency comparisons overcomes these concerns. The paper has been submitted for publication, but you can get the report version immediately. Send me email at the address above or at mhosea@sun.cis.smu.edu and ask for the SMU Math report #92-9 Efficiency Comparisons of Methods for Integrating ODEs, by M.E. Hosea and L.F. Shampine. -- Regards, Mike Hosea (mhosea@seas.smu.edu)
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1993Jan26.163310.8637@seas.smu.edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!seas.smu.edu!mhoseaReferences:
<1993Jan25.180439.26879@fys.ruu.nl>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: sci.math.num-analysis Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!seas.smu.edu!mhosea From: mhosea@seas.smu.edu (Mike Hosea) Subject: Re: need references for Runge-Kutta versus Multi-step ... Message-ID: <1993Jan26.163310.8637@seas.smu.edu> Keywords: Runge, Kutta, multistep, efficiency, ODE, PDE Sender: mhosea@seas.smu.edu Nntp-Posting-Host: express.seas.smu.edu Organization: SMU - School of Engineering & Applied Science - Dallas References: <1993Jan25.180439.26879@fys.ruu.nl> Date: Tue, 26 Jan 1993 16:33:10 GMT Lines: 27