Article View: sci.math.num-analysis
Article #1195Re: maybe, maybe not
From: David Bandel
Date: Fri, 06 Aug 2004 06:06
Date: Fri, 06 Aug 2004 06:06
39 lines
2925 bytes
2925 bytes
RMoebs1@compuserve.de (Peter Pan) wrote in message news:<3cc72195.0408041254.6954521b@posting.google.com>... > Jon <jon8338@peoplepc.com> wrote in message news:<411062AB.4040200@peoplepc.com>... > > > The attempt is made to find the roots to polynomials. > > > > Jon Giffen > > Mr. Jon Giffen > > Dear Jon, > > I am normally a very friendly and patient person, and I haven't flamed > anybody since I got my first computer some 30 years ago. > > But enough is enough ... > > Since about 4 weeks I am reading your attempts to make yourself a name > as a super-mathematician claiming to have solved what is not solvable > in principle, and trying to tyrannize this newsgroup with your > numerous nonsense posts and useless links to your website. > > You have been asked to put your money where your mouth is and to prove > to us what you are claiming - you haven't. You haven't even made the > slightest attempt. > > It appears that the only 'creative' idea in your approach is to write > a polynomial as p = N*T+a_0. There's NOTHING else what's new in your > approach. So I believe that you are just one of those nerds who claim > to have doubled the cube or found the recipe to turn iron into gold. > > Jon, I'm afraid I have to say that very frankly: IT'S JUST PLAIN > BULLSHIT, SO LEAVE US ALONE. > > Sorry for having used strong language, but you don't seem to > understand other statements. idiot. you just wasted your "first flame" on a usenet crackpot. and for your info, writing a polynomial as the product of some column vectors is far from new. in fact it's very very old.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<a88af92f.0408052206.7a0e9229@posting.google.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!postnews2.google.com!not-for-mailReferences:
<411062AB.4040200@peoplepc.com> <3cc72195.0408041254.6954521b@posting.google.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: 107079,57df2e780f987b33 X-Google-Thread: 109d8a,57df2e780f987b33 X-Google-Thread: f72df,57df2e780f987b33 X-Google-Thread: 103471,57df2e780f987b33 X-Google-Thread: 1139f8,57df2e780f987b33 X-Google-Thread: 10d67e,57df2e780f987b33 X-Google-Thread: 1130d6,57df2e780f987b33 X-Google-Thread: f6df2,57df2e780f987b33 X-Google-Attributes: gid107079,gid109d8a,gidf72df,gid103471,gid1139f8,gid10d67e,gid1130d6,gidf6df2,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!postnews2.google.com!not-for-mail From: dwb1729@yahoo.com (David Bandel) Newsgroups: sci.math.num-analysis,sci.math,japan.sci.math,han.sci.math,fr.sci.maths,aus.mathematics,alt.math.recreational,bln.sci.mathematik Subject: Re: maybe, maybe not Date: 5 Aug 2004 23:06:14 -0700 Organization: http://groups.google.com Lines: 39 Message-ID: <a88af92f.0408052206.7a0e9229@posting.google.com> References: <411062AB.4040200@peoplepc.com> <3cc72195.0408041254.6954521b@posting.google.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: 64.217.72.145 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: posting.google.com 1091772419 29123 127.0.0.1 (6 Aug 2004 06:06:59 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 6 Aug 2004 06:06:59 +0000 (UTC)