Article View: sci.math.num-analysis
Article #1198Re: maybe, maybe not
From: Proginoskes
Date: Fri, 06 Aug 2004 08:03
Date: Fri, 06 Aug 2004 08:03
52 lines
3685 bytes
3685 bytes
"Kevin O'Neill" <NOonekev@yahoo.comSPAM> wrote in message news:<KeSdnaZrOaHGfo_cRVn-iA@comcast.com>...
> What he's doing reminds me of political campaigning.
"If you repeat a lie enough times, it becomes true." Except that
mathematics can't be campaigned. (Ooh! I get to use one of my favorite
Richard Feynman quotes: "For a successful technology, reality must take
precidence over public relations, for Nature cannot be fooled.")
> "Peter Pan" <RMoebs1@compuserve.de> wrote in message news:3cc72195.0408041254.6954521b@posting.google.com...
> > Jon <jon8338@peoplepc.com> wrote in message news:<411062AB.4040200@peoplepc.com>...
> >
> > > The attempt is made to find the roots to polynomials.
> > >
> > > Jon Giffen
> >
> > Mr. Jon Giffen
> >
> > Dear Jon,
> >
> > I am normally a very friendly and patient person, and I haven't flamed
> > anybody since I got my first computer some 30 years ago.
> >
> > But enough is enough ...
> >
> > Since about 4 weeks I am reading your attempts to make yourself a name
> > as a super-mathematician claiming to have solved what is not solvable
> > in principle, and trying to tyrannize this newsgroup with your
> > numerous nonsense posts and useless links to your website.
> >
> > You have been asked to put your money where your mouth is and to prove
> > to us what you are claiming - you haven't. You haven't even made the
> > slightest attempt.
He's tried, but his own examples have failed him. (He worked through
the procedure for the polynomial (x-2)(x-3)(x-4) multiplied out and only
got "approximations".) But that doesn't mean anything to him, evidently.
You think that's bad, though, go back through his posts and see how long
it took for him to learn the difference between an "example" and an
"application".
-- Christopher Heckman
> > It appears that the only 'creative' idea in your approach is to write
> > a polynomial as p = N*T+a_0. There's NOTHING else what's new in your
> > approach. So I believe that you are just one of those nerds who claim
> > to have doubled the cube or found the recipe to turn iron into gold.
> >
> > Jon, I'm afraid I have to say that very frankly: IT'S JUST PLAIN
> > BULLSHIT, SO LEAVE US ALONE.
> >
> > Sorry for having used strong language, but you don't seem to
> > understand other statements.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<953c225f.0408060003.3540b9dc@posting.google.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!postnews2.google.com!not-for-mailReferences:
<411062AB.4040200@peoplepc.com> <3cc72195.0408041254.6954521b@posting.google.com> <KeSdnaZrOaHGfo_cRVn-iA@comcast.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: 107079,57df2e780f987b33 X-Google-Thread: 109d8a,57df2e780f987b33 X-Google-Thread: f72df,57df2e780f987b33 X-Google-Thread: 103471,57df2e780f987b33 X-Google-Thread: 1139f8,57df2e780f987b33 X-Google-Thread: 10d67e,57df2e780f987b33 X-Google-Thread: 1130d6,57df2e780f987b33 X-Google-Thread: f6df2,57df2e780f987b33 X-Google-Attributes: gid107079,gid109d8a,gidf72df,gid103471,gid1139f8,gid10d67e,gid1130d6,gidf6df2,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!postnews2.google.com!not-for-mail From: proginoskes@email.msn.com (Proginoskes) Newsgroups: sci.math.num-analysis,sci.math,japan.sci.math,han.sci.math,fr.sci.maths,aus.mathematics,alt.math.recreational,bln.sci.mathematik Subject: Re: maybe, maybe not Date: 6 Aug 2004 01:03:16 -0700 Organization: http://groups.google.com Lines: 52 Message-ID: <953c225f.0408060003.3540b9dc@posting.google.com> References: <411062AB.4040200@peoplepc.com> <3cc72195.0408041254.6954521b@posting.google.com> <KeSdnaZrOaHGfo_cRVn-iA@comcast.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: 67.224.21.190 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: posting.google.com 1091779397 2442 127.0.0.1 (6 Aug 2004 08:03:17 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 6 Aug 2004 08:03:17 +0000 (UTC)