Article View: sci.math.num-analysis
Article #1297Re: Can erand48 really generate a 1.0?
From: Rich Teer
Date: Sat, 08 Mar 2003 18:25
Date: Sat, 08 Mar 2003 18:25
23 lines
2078 bytes
2078 bytes
On Sat, 8 Mar 2003, Fred Ma wrote: > P.S. > Seriously, if it's not standard C, who decides which source > code is the authority? Or is there just one defacto standard? ISO C is not theonly (programming) standard. The Single UNIX Specification (SUS), POSIX, and System V INterface Definition (SVID) are obvious ones that apply to UNIX programming. The function that is the subject of this thread has behaviour defined by all versions of the SUS, and by the SVID. So long as the implementation behaves as described in the standards, it doesn't matter HOW it's implemented. -- Rich Teer, SCNA President, Rite Online Inc. Voice: +1 (250) 979-1638 URL: http://www.rite-online.net
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<Pine.GSO.4.44.0303081022520.5487-100000@electron>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!cyclone.bc.net!sjc70.webusenet.com!news.webusenet.com!pd2nf1so.cg.shawcable.net!residential.shaw.ca!news2.calgary.shaw.ca.POSTED!not-for-mailReferences:
<3E680C85.C262DCF5@doe.carleton.ca> <GX1aa.47402$zb.13470470@twister.socal.rr.com> <3E6A1FFB.D9439E10@doe.carleton.ca>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: fc89c,772ea27ce7480c6b X-Google-Attributes: gidfc89c,public X-Google-Thread: 107079,8ae001fa56b91764 X-Google-Attributes: gid107079,public X-Google-Thread: 10ba33,b29f48edf19c163e X-Google-Attributes: gid10ba33,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-03-08 10:25:42 PST Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!cyclone.bc.net!sjc70.webusenet.com!news.webusenet.com!pd2nf1so.cg.shawcable.net!residential.shaw.ca!news2.calgary.shaw.ca.POSTED!not-for-mail X-Trace-PostClient-IP: 24.77.201.188 Newsgroups: sci.math.num-analysis,gnu.g++.help,comp.unix.programmer From: Rich Teer <rich.teer@rite-group.com> X-X-Sender: rich@electron Subject: Re: Can erand48 really generate a 1.0? In-Reply-To: <3E6A1FFB.D9439E10@doe.carleton.ca> Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.44.0303081022520.5487-100000@electron> References: <3E680C85.C262DCF5@doe.carleton.ca> <GX1aa.47402$zb.13470470@twister.socal.rr.com> <3E6A1FFB.D9439E10@doe.carleton.ca> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Lines: 24 Date: Sat, 08 Mar 2003 18:25:41 GMT NNTP-Posting-Host: 24.67.253.205 X-Complaints-To: abuse@shaw.ca X-Trace: news2.calgary.shaw.ca 1047147941 24.67.253.205 (Sat, 08 Mar 2003 11:25:41 MST) NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 08 Mar 2003 11:25:41 MST Organization: Shaw Residential Internet