Article View: sci.math.num-analysis
Article #520Re: FULL HOUSE
From: Jeff Boyd
Date: Sun, 13 Sep 1992 15:50
Date: Sun, 13 Sep 1992 15:50
9 lines
650 bytes
650 bytes
It seems to me that you aren't dealing from a full deck :-). I think you're in fact dealing from a "fuller-than-full" deck, but I could be wrong. I don't see any mechanism for altering the probabilities after you draw a card, and if this is the case then you are not sampling without replacement (as you should be). jeff
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<92257.115045BOYDJ@QUCDN.QueensU.CA>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!utcsri!torn!news.ccs.queensu.ca!qucdn!boydjShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!utcsri!torn!news.ccs.queensu.ca!qucdn!boydj Organization: Queen's University at Kingston Date: Sunday, 13 Sep 1992 11:50:44 EDT From: Jeff Boyd <BOYDJ@QUCDN.QueensU.CA> Message-ID: <92257.115045BOYDJ@QUCDN.QueensU.CA> Newsgroups: sci.math.num-analysis Subject: Re: FULL HOUSE Lines: 10