Article View: sci.math.num-analysis
Article #671Re: Points in Polygons
From: Han de Bruijn
Date: Wed, 30 Sep 1992 10:11
Date: Wed, 30 Sep 1992 10:11
52 lines
3226 bytes
3226 bytes
In article <1992Sep27.022750.8620@leland.Stanford.EDU> Laurence James Edwards: > Wow! I had forgotten what a godly book Preparata&Shamos is. In article <1992Sep28.083843.23616@dutrun2.tudelft.nl> Han de Bruijn: > Bad taste. In article <1992Sep28.231335.10973@leland.Stanford.EDU> Laurence James Edwards: > While I wouldn't recommend it for recreational reading, Preparata&Shamos does > present a comprehensive and coherent account of computational geometry, > and I think it is the first book devoted to the subject. Trivialiter, because Preparata&Shamos are the _inventors_ of "Computational Geometry". Same story with "The Fractal Geometry of Nature", by Mandelbrot, which is, equally trivialiter, the "first" book about fractals. Actually, the stuff covered by Preparata & Shamos IMNSHO barely justifies the creation of a new, separate, area of investigation. A most important part of it (Voronoi tesselation) is nothing new & belongs to classical mathematics. In article <5C1-w=_@engin.umich.edu> Samer Takriti: > I have received many answers referring to "Computational Geometry, > an introduction" by Preparata and Shamos. Thanks. > It looks to me that he methods proposed by this book can be applied > in R^2 only. Applying these methods in higher dimensions would > increase the complexity of the algorithm (exponential complexity). The book doesn't contain obvious generalizations to multiple dimensions in the first place. Even worse. Solutions in 2-D are presented in such a way that a generalization from that point to, say, three dimensions is made impossible beforehand. One shouldn't use specific properties of the plane (like orientation of angles) in a theory that could be generalized to three and more dimensions. Overall, the attacks presented in the book are quite unprofessional. Any experienced programmer could do better. Godly book? You know what godly books are? Here is a list of my ultimate favorites: - "The Feynman Lectures on Physics, part III" - "The Theory of Radiation" by Max Planck - "The Special Theory of Relativity" by Albert Einstein - "Relativity Reexamined" by Leon Brillouin - "Le phenomene humaine" by Teilhard de Chardin - "Das Kapital, part 1" by Karl Marx - "Buitenaardse Beschaving" by Stefan Denaerde - And, oh well, The Bible itself ... Preparata&Shamos, or Mandelbrot, will never be in that list. -- * Han de Bruijn; Applications&Graphics | "A little bit of Physics * No * TUD Computing Centre; P.O. Box 354 | would be NO idleness in * Oil * 2600 AJ Delft; The Netherlands. | Mathematics" (HdB). * for * E-mail: Han.deBruijn@RC.TUDelft.NL --| Fax: +31 15 78 37 87 ----* Blood
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1992Sep30.101144.11382@dutrun2.tudelft.nl>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!mcsun!sun4nl!dutrun!dutrun2!dutrun2!rcpshdbShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: sci.math.num-analysis Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!mcsun!sun4nl!dutrun!dutrun2!dutrun2!rcpshdb From: rcpshdb@dutrun2.tudelft.nl (Han de Bruijn) Subject: Re: Points in Polygons Message-ID: <1992Sep30.101144.11382@dutrun2.tudelft.nl> Originator: rcpshdb@dutrun2.tudelft.nl Sender: news@dutrun2.tudelft.nl (UseNet News System) Nntp-Posting-Host: dutrun2.tudelft.nl Reply-To: rcpshdb@dutrun2.tudelft.nl (Han de Bruijn) Organization: Delft University of Technology Date: Wed, 30 Sep 1992 10:11:44 GMT Lines: 52