🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: sci.math.num-analysis
Article #895

Re: mathematica stepwise regression package

#895
From: David Moore
Date: Tue, 15 Dec 1992 20:30
18 lines
1225 bytes
andersh@maths.lth.se (Anders Holtsberg) writes:


>gary mcclelland mcclella@yertle.colorado.edu:

>You mean what is bad? Let's say we want to make predictions.
>Is the idea of using a subset of the predictors that is bad or
>do you mean the stepwise way to pick them? If the latter: do
>you know any better way (except trying all combinations)?

What about canonical co-ordinates? I always felt that this method
gave you a better feel for what might be going on, but it is
years since I did any econometrics.

What are the drawbacks of this method, assuming you use it
intelligently. (Obviously, the comments about the need for
thought and intuition apply equally well whatever method
you use).
Technical Details
Message-ID: <davidm.724451400@questor>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!rational.com!questor!davidm
References: <1446@ares.edsr.eds.com> <mcclella.724399758@yertle.Colorado.EDU> <1992Dec15.083258.1474@lth.se>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: sci.math.num-analysis,sci.math.stat,sci.math.symbolic
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!rational.com!questor!davidm
From: davidm@questor.Rational.COM (David Moore)
Subject: Re: mathematica stepwise regression package
Message-ID: <davidm.724451400@questor>
Keywords: mathematica stepwise regression
Sender: news@rational.com
Organization: Rational
References: <1446@ares.edsr.eds.com> <mcclella.724399758@yertle.Colorado.EDU> <1992Dec15.083258.1474@lth.se>
Date: Tue, 15 Dec 1992 20:30:00 GMT
Lines: 19