Article View: sci.math.num-analysis
Article #938Mesh generation schemes (was Re: FEA help!)
From: S.N. Muthukrishnan
Date: Wed, 16 Dec 1992 23:38
Date: Wed, 16 Dec 1992 23:38
56 lines
3124 bytes
3124 bytes
In article <1992Dec16.164320@roper.mc.ti.com> a722756@roper.mc.ti.com (W. Donald Rolph) writes: > > In article <1992Dec15.225304.11571@porthos.cc.bellcore.com>, bhatia@bigcat.bellcore.com (Raman Bhatia) writes: > |> In article <1992Dec14.181725@roper.mc.ti.com>, a722756@roper.mc.ti.com (W. Donald Rolph) writes: > |> |> > |> |> This is by no means a trivial question. You must first ask the class of FEA to > |> > |> Raman Bhatia (bhatia@bigcat.bellcore.com) > > I have an interesting proof that show that the triangularization schemes all > violate controllability theory at any given point in the model. The effect is > that in 3D, with typcial dimensions in orthoganoal directions which have > significantly different scales (1.4 in thick by 5 inches wide by 20 inches long), > the triangularizations schemes produce highly unsatisfactory meshes for many > classes of problems, particularly nonlinear problems. It is interesting to note > the CFd codes are gradually adopting Laplacian mesh generation schemes, schemes > which were popular as early as 1960 for fea. It should be noted that CFD can be > very suseptible to poor meshes, and perhaps there is a message here! > > I have simplistic proof which suggests that Laplacian mapping produces the > "optimal mesh" fgor certain classes of problems, based on the givven mesh density > provided as input. I also have s ample program which generates hexahedral meshes > off an arbitray boundary rep trimmed nurb solid model, demonstrating that the > technogy is feasible, and the input is not overly burdensome. > -- > > Regards. > > Don Rolph a722756@pan.mc.ti.com WD3 MS10-13 (508)-699-1263 Yes. That is true. However, it is possible to control the "aspect ratio" in meshes, be it 2-D or 3-D. I assume that in 2-D it is triangular elements and in 3-D it is tetrahedral elements. Laplacian mapping is one way to improve the aspect ratio. There is also a very good paper in mesh smoothing. I shall mail it or post it if there is any interest. I don't remember it off my head. -Muthu -- --------------------------------------------------------------------- S. N. Muthukrishnan | muthu@mecad.uta.edu | Dept.of Mech. Engg., UT, Arlington | muthu@fem.uta.edu |(NeXT mail) Arlington, TX 76019 | muthu@newton.uta.edu| _____________________________________________________________________ "Perception is a reality. Reality is myth" ---------------------------------------------------------------------
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1992Dec16.233849.5900@utagraph.uta.edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!cs.utexas.edu!news.uta.edu!newsReferences:
<1992Dec16.164320@roper.mc.ti.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: sci.math.num-analysis,sci.engr.mech Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!cs.utexas.edu!news.uta.edu!news From: muthu@mecad.uta.edu (S.N. Muthukrishnan) Subject: Mesh generation schemes (was Re: FEA help!) Message-ID: <1992Dec16.233849.5900@utagraph.uta.edu> Sender: news@utagraph.uta.edu (USENET News System) Nntp-Posting-Host: mecad.uta.edu Reply-To: muthu@mecad.uta.edu Organization: University of Texas at Arlington References: <1992Dec16.164320@roper.mc.ti.com> Date: Wed, 16 Dec 1992 23:38:49 GMT Lines: 56