Thread View: sci.math.num-analysis
1 messages
1 total messages
Started by James Hurst
Sat, 07 Nov 1992 01:10
what kind of matrix solvers do you recommend?
Author: James Hurst
Date: Sat, 07 Nov 1992 01:10
Date: Sat, 07 Nov 1992 01:10
36 lines
1870 bytes
1870 bytes
I've just had a nasty time moving a sparse solver onto a Cray to support some chemistry/hydrodynamic finite element work. The difficulty convinced our group to give some thought to what math libraries we want to be using in the next few years, both public and private domain. In particular, several solvers, both public domain and commercial, failed numerically on the speciation problem, much to my surprise. Dongarra's LAPACK seems to be a common denominator for many folks, but it doesn't cover all our needs, particularly large sparse systems. Many of the sparse solvers don't give much in the way of non-symmetric matrices, either, which rules them out for our chemistry, if not our FE things. So I want to survey the net with a few general questions about mid- to large sized matrix solvers. Respond by email, and I'll summarize the results. What general matrix solvers do you use in you codes? Why this solver? Are you happy with it? If you do sparse matrix work, what solver do you use? Why this solver? Is your problem symmetric? Are you happy with it? If you do banded matrix work, what solver do you use? Why this solver? Are you happy with it? Thanks for your help, back in a week or so. Cheers, Jim Hurst jhurst@ese.ogi.edu
Thread Navigation
This is a paginated view of messages in the thread with full content displayed inline.
Messages are displayed in chronological order, with the original post highlighted in green.
Use pagination controls to navigate through all messages in large threads.
Back to All Threads