🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Thread View: sci.math.num-analysis
1 messages
1 total messages Started by James H Miller Tue, 29 Dec 1992 20:08
Hyperbolic Systems...(question)
#920
Author: James H Miller
Date: Tue, 29 Dec 1992 20:08
86 lines
2943 bytes
Ok here it is......

First start with a system that is hyperbolic or at least quasi-hyperbolic.
Such as...


        [U]     +     [F]    =   [0]                         (1)
           t             x            


where [F] is (or has the property of being) homogeneous of degree one in [U]. 
This means(I think..) that the above equation can be written as :

        [U]      +     [A][U]    = 0                           (2) 
           t                 x 	
		

Where [A] is given as d[F]/d[U] = [A].    
For the above system to be purely hyperbolic the eigenvalues of [A] must all
be real and distinct. If the eigenvalues are repeated the system can be
"hyperbolic" if a set of eigenvectors are linearly independent.
Given this hyperbolic system of equations (or at least quasi-hyperbolic), I
would like to show the following:



        [R]   +  [A][R]   = 0                                  (3)
           t           x            

	

	where [R] is a square matrix whose columns consist of the right eigenvectors of
[A]. 
This type of equation comes about if one tries to manipulate the second 
equation into a form via the substitution: [R][w] = [U]
Which gives:.....

        ([R]    +   [A][R] ) [w]  + [R][w]   +  [A][R][w]   = [0]   (4)
            t             x               t              x       

	Then we get the result:


                         [w]      +     [R]^(-1)[A][R][w]    = [0]    (5)
                            t                            x
Or:
                      \
        [w]       + [ /\ ] [w]   = [0]   
           t                  x         
                  \   
           where [/\] is a diagonal matrix having eigenvalues on its diagonal. 


So the bottom line is can you show equation (3) equals zero.? 
An engineer's way around that is to say [R] is a constant :) but 
since this news group is a math mecca I was hoping to find a more sophiscated
way! 


	Well, thanks in advance!  
	P.S. I hope the tabs and spaces show up as I typed them....



------------------------------------------------------------------------------


	Jim Miller				jhmiller@iastate.edu
	Department of Aerospace                 phone:  515-294-9497
	      Engineering 
	Iowa State University
	(maybe a graduate someday)

	"Failing to plan is planning to fail" - John Atella
	"The roof! The roof! The roof is on fiyah!........"









 	
Thread Navigation

This is a paginated view of messages in the thread with full content displayed inline.

Messages are displayed in chronological order, with the original post highlighted in green.

Use pagination controls to navigate through all messages in large threads.

Back to All Threads