Article View: sci.math.research
Article #70Union of flat cells in R^3
From: le
Date: Mon, 14 Sep 1992 10:10
Date: Mon, 14 Sep 1992 10:10
36 lines
1530 bytes
1530 bytes
I believe that the following statement is true, but I have
been unable to find it in the literature
(by the way, I know that \beta(3,3,3,0) is false).
Assume that D_1,...,D_n (for n >= 2) are locally flat 3-cells
in Euclidian 3-space R^3 such that
all the D_i's have exactly one point p in common; i.e.,
D_i \cap D_j = Bd D_i \cap Bd D_j = {p}
for all pairwise distinct i and j.
If for each \epsilon > 0 there exists a flat 2-sphere R (e.g.
R is homeomorphic to S^2 and flat) such that
p is contained in the interior of R,
the diameter of R is smaller than \epsilon, and
the sphere R intersects each D_i in a simple closed curve;
then the cells D_1,...,D_n are simultaneously flat; e.g., there
exists a "flattening" homeomorphism h of R^3 such that h(D_i) is a
simplex with h(p) as a vertex (for i=1,...,n).
Any suggestions, hints are welcome.
Thanks in advance.
(Le, Computer Science Dep.)
le@fuhainf.fernuni-hagen.de
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<BuKC9E.I38@fuhainf.fernuni-hagen.de>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!spool.mu.edu!uwm.edu!ux1.cso.uiuc.edu!news.cso.uiuc.edu!usenetShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: sci.math.research Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!spool.mu.edu!uwm.edu!ux1.cso.uiuc.edu!news.cso.uiuc.edu!usenet From: le@fuhainf.fernuni-hagen.de Subject: Union of flat cells in R^3 Message-ID: <BuKC9E.I38@fuhainf.fernuni-hagen.de> Sender: Daniel Grayson <dan@math.uiuc.edu> X-Submissions-To: sci-math-research@uiuc.edu Organization: FernUniversitaet Hagen X-Administrivia-To: sci-math-research-request@uiuc.edu Approved: Daniel Grayson <dan@math.uiuc.edu> Date: Mon, 14 Sep 1992 10:10:25 GMT Keywords: Topological embeddings. Lines: 37