Re: Bott-Tate formula

Article View: sci.math.research

Article #86

#86

From: Allan Adler
Date: Sun, 23 Aug 1992 14:40

2 lines
760 bytes

I have found the answer to my question about the Bott-Tate formula. There is
a paper by J.E.Schneider in J.Alg.27 (1973) 112-116 which contains this.

Technical Details

Message-ID: <9208231435.AA06548@life.ai.mit.edu>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!ogicse!uwm.edu!ux1.cso.uiuc.edu!news.cso.uiuc.edu!usenet

References: <ARA.92Aug21211804@camelot.ai.mit.edu>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!ogicse!uwm.edu!ux1.cso.uiuc.edu!news.cso.uiuc.edu!usenet
From: ara@martigny.ai.mit.edu (Allan Adler)
Newsgroups: sci.math.research
Subject: Re: Bott-Tate formula
Message-ID: <9208231435.AA06548@life.ai.mit.edu>
Date: 23 Aug 92 14:40:02 GMT
Article-I.D.: life.9208231435.AA06548
References: <ARA.92Aug21211804@camelot.ai.mit.edu>
Sender: Daniel Grayson <dan@math.uiuc.edu>
Organization: University of Illinois at Urbana
Lines: 2
Approved: Daniel Grayson <dan@math.uiuc.edu>
X-Submissions-To: sci-math-research@uiuc.edu
X-Administrivia-To: sci-math-research-request@uiuc.edu

Reply to Parent Message