Thread View: sci.math.research
2 messages
2 total messages
Started by Chris Fernandes
Sun, 30 Aug 1992 23:39
convex functions on L_1 spaces
Author: Chris Fernandes
Date: Sun, 30 Aug 1992 23:39
Date: Sun, 30 Aug 1992 23:39
18 lines
1377 bytes
1377 bytes
I have a question regarding convex functions on L_1 spaces. Consider the space L_1. Let U: L_1->R be a strictly convex function. Let G be a closed convex and bounded set in L_1. Is it then true that the function U achieves its minimum on the set G? I have not been able to find this result in any reference book. Intuitively, the result seems to be true, but I cannot come up with a clean proof. I do know that the set G is compact in the weak* topology, but on L_1 the weak* and the weak do not coincide. For example, in L_2, the set is weakly compact and thus the minimum is achieved. Hopefully yours, Indrajit, mailing from friend's account.
Re: convex functions on L_1 spaces
Author: Robert B. Israel
Date: Mon, 31 Aug 1992 17:00
Date: Mon, 31 Aug 1992 17:00
37 lines
2032 bytes
2032 bytes
In <fernand.715217944@acf9> Indrajit, using the account of
fernand@acf9.nyu.edu (Chris Fernandes) writes:
>I have a question regarding convex functions on L_1 spaces.
>Consider the space L_1.
>Let U: L_1->R be a strictly convex function.
>Let G be a closed convex and bounded set in L_1.
>Is it then true that the function U achieves its minimum on the set G?
Not true in l_1: let G = { x: x_i >= 0, sum_i x_i = 1 } and U(x) = sum_i x_i^2.
The infimum is 0 (consider U(x) where x_i = 1/n for 1 <= i <= n, 0
otherwise), but it is not achieved. I don't have an example for other
L_1 spaces, but it probably wouldn't be hard to construct.
>I have not been able to find this result in any reference book. Intuitively,
> the result seems to be true, but I cannot come up with a clean proof.
>I do know that the set G is compact in the weak* topology, but on L_1
>the weak* and the weak do not coincide.
What weak* topology? L_1 spaces (except for l_1) are generally not dual
spaces.
> For example, in L_2, the set
>is weakly compact and thus the minimum is achieved.
>Hopefully yours,
>Indrajit, mailing from friend's account.
--
Robert Israel israel@math.ubc.ca
Department of Mathematics or israel@unixg.ubc.ca
University of British Columbia
Vancouver, BC, Canada V6T 1Y4
Thread Navigation
This is a paginated view of messages in the thread with full content displayed inline.
Messages are displayed in chronological order, with the original post highlighted in green.
Use pagination controls to navigate through all messages in large threads.
Back to All Threads