🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: sci.math.stat
Article #401

sample size and Maximulikelihood estimates in LISREL

#401
From: mokaba
Date: Tue, 18 Aug 1992 15:23
17 lines
1407 bytes
could somebody explain in English what the true effect of sample size
is on maximulikelihood estimates.  I have been playing around with 
LISREL and have a little problem conceptualizing the effect of sample
size on the estimates I get using maximumlikelihood estimators.  Are the
effects comming in becuase of the effect of sample size on the standard
error of estimates or is there something I am too dense to see. 
I have also learn that the problem with large sample in LISREL is that they
lead to even small effect being significant... or something like that..
Furthermore, is a sample of 103 good enough for a full model estimation.
i.e running the Mesurement equations at the same time as the Structural 
model.  

My Q-Plot has a tangent of less than 1 (angle less than 45 degrees) would 
this respond to increase in sample size?...

Thanks for answering this question ... e-mail welcome.
Mokaba
Technical Details
Message-ID: <1992Aug18.152355.16237@news.cs.brandeis.edu>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!cs.utexas.edu!sun-barr!olivea!news.bbn.com!noc.near.net!news.cs.brandeis.edu!binah.cc.brandeis.edu!MOKABA

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!cs.utexas.edu!sun-barr!olivea!news.bbn.com!noc.near.net!news.cs.brandeis.edu!binah.cc.brandeis.edu!MOKABA
From: mokaba@binah.cc.brandeis.edu
Newsgroups: sci.math.stat
Subject: sample size and Maximulikelihood  estimates in LISREL
Message-ID: <1992Aug18.152355.16237@news.cs.brandeis.edu>
Date: 18 Aug 92 15:23:55 GMT
Sender: news@news.cs.brandeis.edu (USENET News System)
Reply-To: mokaba@binah.cc.brandeis.edu
Organization: Brandeis University
Lines: 17