Article View: sci.math.stat
Article #548Re: multi-colinearity in full lisrel models
From: T. Scott Thompson
Date: Mon, 09 Nov 1992 17:18
Date: Mon, 09 Nov 1992 17:18
94 lines
5087 bytes
5087 bytes
mokaba@binah.cc.brandeis.edu writes: >Could someone help the novice!! >I am working on estimatic both structural and measurement parameter using >LISREL. I used 19 indicators of 6 latent varible, three of which are >eta's (endogenous) and the other three are ksi's (exogenous). >Problem : >In estimating this model I get negative beta coefficients where i expected >positive ones. Some one suggested that I could be have a mulcolinearity >problem. How do I test for it in LISREL? How do I resolve it short of >eliminating one of the varibales from the model? >e-mails appreciated. (1) Multicolinearity may lead to large standard errors for your estimates but it should not bias them. (Extreme multicolinearity can lead to loss of identification, in which case the bias is not a very meaningful concept.) (2) The only way to eliminate multicolinearity is to get better data. All of the "fix-up" procedures in the literature correspond to imposing linear restrictions on the parameters. If these are justified by a priori considerations then you should be imposing them anyhow. If not, then imposing them may seriously distort your analysis. Art Goldberger, in his text "A Course in Econometrics", makes the case that mulicolinearity receives too much attention in the literature because it has a fancy name, but has the same effects on data analysis as the problem of not having enough data. In a very clever parody he attempts to remedy the imbalance by endowing the latter with the name "micronumerosity." Here are some hilights from his parody. I have substituted for his mathematical notation where appropriate. --------------------------------------------------------------------- The following is excerpted (without permission) from "A Course in Econometrics", Arthur S. Goldberger, Harvard Press, 1991. Micronumerosity. The extreme case, "exact micronumerosity" arises when n=0, in which case the sample estimate of mu [the mean] is not unique. (Technically, there is a violation of the rank condition n>0: the matrix 0 is singular.) ... "Near micronumerosity" is more subtle, and yet very serious. It arises when the rank condition n>0 is barely satisfied. Near micronumerosity is very prevalent in empirical economics. Consequences of Micronumerosity. The consequences ... are serious. Precision of estimation is reduced. There are two aspects of this reduction: estimates of [the mean] may have large errors, and not only that, but [the variance of the estimate] will be large. Investigators will sometimes be led to accept the hypothesis mu=0 because [the t-statistic] is small, even though the true situation may be not that mu=0 but simply that the sample data have not enabled us to pick mu up. The estimate of mu will be very sensitive to sample data, and the addition of a few more observations can sometimes produce drastic shifts in the sample mean. ... Testing for Micronumerosity. Test for the presence of micronumerosity requires the judicious use of various fingers. Some researchers prefer a single finger, others use their toes, still others let their thumbs rule. A generally reliable guide is to count the number of observations. Most of the time in econometric analysis, when n is close to zero ,it is also far from infinity. Several test procedures develop critical values n*, such that micronumerosity is a problem on if n is smaller than n*. But those procedures are questionable. Remedies for Micronumerosity. If micronumerosity proves serious in the sense that the estimate of mu has an unsatisfactorily low degree of precision, we are in the statistical position of not being able to make bricks without straw. The remedy lies essentially in the acquistion, if possible, of larger samples from the same population. But more data are no remedy for micronumerosity if the additional data are simply "more of the same." So obtaining lots of small samples from the same population will not help. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Goldberger goes on (in a more serious vein) to note that multicolinearity can actually _improve_ estimates of some linear combinations of the parameters. -- T. Scott Thompson email: thompson@atlas.socsci.umn.edu Department of Economics phone: (612) 625-0119 University of Minnesota fax: (612) 624-0209
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<thompson.721329501@daphne.socsci.umn.edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!sun-barr!cs.utexas.edu!sdd.hp.com!caen!sol.ctr.columbia.edu!The-Star.honeywell.com!umn.edu!thompsonReferences:
<1992Nov5.182658.9351@news.cs.brandeis.edu>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: sci.math.stat Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!sun-barr!cs.utexas.edu!sdd.hp.com!caen!sol.ctr.columbia.edu!The-Star.honeywell.com!umn.edu!thompson From: thompson@atlas.socsci.umn.edu (T. Scott Thompson) Subject: Re: multi-colinearity in full lisrel models Message-ID: <thompson.721329501@daphne.socsci.umn.edu> Sender: news@news2.cis.umn.edu (Usenet News Administration) Nntp-Posting-Host: daphne.socsci.umn.edu Reply-To: thompson@atlas.socsci.umn.edu Organization: Economics Department, University of Minnesota References: <1992Nov5.182658.9351@news.cs.brandeis.edu> Date: Mon, 9 Nov 1992 17:18:21 GMT Lines: 94