Article View: sci.math.stat
Article #602Re: robust location estimators
From: ibidem
Date: Thu, 01 Oct 1992 03:58
Date: Thu, 01 Oct 1992 03:58
6 lines
787 bytes
787 bytes
> ... why robust location estimators have not become more popular. One answer might be: too many candidates, with too many differing theoretical optimality properties. As it stands, the problem of robust estimation is not reasonably well-defined. It will take a new approach, I suspect, at some future date.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<44800@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!wupost!uwm.edu!linac!att!ucbvax!wizzle.Berkeley.EDU!beranReferences:
<19s96oINNdd9@agate.berkeley.edu>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!wupost!uwm.edu!linac!att!ucbvax!wizzle.Berkeley.EDU!beran From: beran@wizzle.Berkeley.EDU (ibidem) Newsgroups: sci.math.stat Subject: Re: robust location estimators Keywords: robust estimation, biweight, trimmed mean, median, mean Message-ID: <44800@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU> Date: 1 Oct 92 03:58:54 GMT References: <19s96oINNdd9@agate.berkeley.edu> Sender: nobody@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU Organization: Dept. of Statistics, U. C. Berkeley Lines: 6