🚀 go-pugleaf

Was it just me, or did anyone else cringe a bit at Ross Perot's
methods of "asking the volunteers" whether he should run for 
President?

Some problems I saw with his "technique" were:

1) defining the population. Is a "Perot Volunteer" someone who signed
the petition to put him on the ballot? Are people who are paid allowed
to vote?

2) Deciding on the sampling method. Apparently, some states just
got together 30-50 people they knew supported Perot and decided without
asking other Perot supporters in the state. Other states made more of
an effort to contact thousands of supporters. And apparently 
part of the decision was made on the number of calls to the 800 number. 
Trouble was, they did not tell people before they called that they could
not vote no, only yes. 

3) Conducting a sample representative of the population. It seems to
me that the most fair way to determine support would have been to 
conduct a random sample of those who signed petitions, and then 
weight those results by the size of the state. 

I think what surprised me most was the failure of the news media to 
question his sampling technique. Should journalism students be required
to take more statistics?


Anyway, I'm voting for Bill Clinton. 

-Mary Howard