Article View: sci.math.stat
Article #755Fitting Data and Fitting Integrals
From: ritley
Date: Thu, 17 Dec 1992 13:37
Date: Thu, 17 Dec 1992 13:37
27 lines
1676 bytes
1676 bytes
I am trying to determine the coefficients of a nonlinear function which fit a probability distribution (x,P(x)). The distribution P(x) is a set of data points (usually several thousand) generated by a computer model and thus contains noise. I have discovered that it is not only possibly to fit the function directly to the data, but also it is possible to fit the integral of the function to the integral of the data. In fact, the integral of the data can be a smoother function. I would like to know if examining the "fitted integral" in this way can be a useful technique for determining the "best-fit" coefficients. Although one must be careful about what one means by "best-fit" and "goodness of fit", it seems to me that examining both the function and its integral might give more information than by examining the function alone. For example, it is conceivable that the data set as well as its integral may both have physical meaning. However, it is also conceivable that the integral of the data contains less information than the data itself. I have no background in statistics and thus any help/comments/suggestions/pointers-to-the-literature would be _greatly_ appreciated!
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<BzEoJ0.49v@news.cso.uiuc.edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!moe.ksu.ksu.edu!ux1.cso.uiuc.edu!news.cso.uiuc.edu!uimrl7.mrl.uiuc.edu!ritleyShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: sci.math.stat Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!moe.ksu.ksu.edu!ux1.cso.uiuc.edu!news.cso.uiuc.edu!uimrl7.mrl.uiuc.edu!ritley From: ritley@uimrl2.mrl.uiuc.edu () Subject: Fitting Data and Fitting Integrals Message-ID: <BzEoJ0.49v@news.cso.uiuc.edu> Sender: usenet@news.cso.uiuc.edu (Net Noise owner) Reply-To: ritley@uiucmrl.bitnet () Organization: Materials Research Lab Date: Thu, 17 Dec 1992 13:37:47 GMT Lines: 29