Article View: sci.math.stat
Article #765Text references for distributions
From: Chip Harvey
Date: Thu, 17 Dec 1992 23:46
Date: Thu, 17 Dec 1992 23:46
9 lines
755 bytes
755 bytes
Is Johnson & Kotz still considered to be the best reference for distributions? The Houghton-Mifflin series by Johnson & Kotz appears good, but perhaps there are better or more recent and less expensive references. I'd appreciate any such information. Thanks in advance & Season's Greetings. Chip Harvey charvey@csn.org
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<BzFGot.LyG@csn.org>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu!csn!teal.csn.org!charveyShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: sci.math.stat Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu!csn!teal.csn.org!charvey From: charvey@teal.csn.org (Chip Harvey) Subject: Text references for distributions Message-ID: <BzFGot.LyG@csn.org> Sender: news@csn.org (news) Nntp-Posting-Host: teal.csn.org Organization: Colorado SuperNet, Inc. X-Newsreader: Tin 1.1 PL4 Date: Thu, 17 Dec 1992 23:46:04 GMT Lines: 10