Article View: sci.math.stat
Article #789Milliken experiment
From: anthony.r.rizzo
Date: Mon, 04 Jan 1993 22:15
Date: Mon, 04 Jan 1993 22:15
39 lines
2557 bytes
2557 bytes
When I was in college, the following experiment was among those required of us: with the use of a watch, a microscope and two fiducial lines on the lens, we had to time the descent rate of minute particles of glass (microspheres). The goal was to determine the charge of a single electron from the speed measurements as the spheres traversed a known distance in a known electric field. In the absence of the electric field, the motion of the spheres was somewhat brownian, with a slight bias for gravity. But in the presence of the electric field, the spheres reached a terminal velocity that was a function of the number of charged particles trapped on each sphere. For the sake of this discussion, the physics of the experiment are irrelevant. What is relevant is the technique by which Milliken estimated the charge of a single electron. The experiment yields a wide distribution of velocities. If all the spheres had a single electron trapped upon then, then the distribution would be centered about the velocity that corresponded to the charge of one electron. But there is no way of knowing how many electrons are trapped on any sphere. So, Milliken (and I ;-) collected many data points and tried to determine graphically, by plotting a histogram, the charge of a single electron. The lowest observed peak corresponded to the charge of a single electron, and the other observed peaks corresponded to multiples of the lowest, approximately. Needless to say, Milliken was far more successful with this experiment than was I. But the question has come up again, in a slightly different form. Given a sequential listing, what algorithm can I use (program) to determine the various means (or peaks), probability density functions, and appropriate summary statistics? I can spot the peaks manually, of course, by simply plotting histograms and looking at them. But I would like to automate the process, since I might have to study hundreds of listings. References are most welcome, of course. Thanks. Tony Rizzo (att.com!hogpb!rizzo) (greetings Art. How's the weather in CA? ;-)
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1993Jan4.221504.19180@cbfsb.cb.att.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu!usenet.ins.cwru.edu!agate!ames!pacbell.com!att-out!cbfsb!cbnewsf.cb.att.com!rizzoShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: sci.math.stat Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu!usenet.ins.cwru.edu!agate!ames!pacbell.com!att-out!cbfsb!cbnewsf.cb.att.com!rizzo From: rizzo@cbnewsf.cb.att.com (anthony.r.rizzo) Subject: Milliken experiment Message-ID: <1993Jan4.221504.19180@cbfsb.cb.att.com> Sender: news@cbfsb.cb.att.com Organization: AT&T Date: Mon, 4 Jan 1993 22:15:04 GMT Lines: 40