Article View: sci.math.stat
Article #860factorial design: Resolution?
From: anthony.r.rizzo
Date: Tue, 12 Jan 1993 17:27
Date: Tue, 12 Jan 1993 17:27
23 lines
1304 bytes
1304 bytes
I'm sure that this is a trivial question for most of you.
But the answer isn't obvious to me. So, here goes:
I'm doing a factorial experiment, 6 variables at two settings.
The variables are qualitative, not quantitative.
According to Box, Hunter, and Hunter, this is a 2^(6-1) half fraction,
because I'm using 32 runs (on a computer). I've assigned
the 6th variable to the column for the 12345 interaction.
Does this make it a resolution VI design? The generator
is: I = 1 2 3 4 5 6
so that 6 = 1 2 3 4 5
1 = 2 3 4 5 6
2 = 1 3 4 5 6
3 = 1 2 4 5 6
4 = 1 2 3 5 6
and 5 = 1 2 3 4 6
Box, Hunter, and Hunter says that "In general, the RESOLUTION of a
two-level fractional design is the length of the shortest
word in the defining relation." Am I interpreting matters correctly?
Tony Rizzo (att.com!hogpb!rizzo)
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1993Jan12.172726.7582@cbfsb.cb.att.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!olivea!spool.mu.edu!uwm.edu!linac!att!cbnewsm!cbnewsl!att-out!cbfsb!cbnewsf.cb.att.com!rizzoShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!olivea!spool.mu.edu!uwm.edu!linac!att!cbnewsm!cbnewsl!att-out!cbfsb!cbnewsf.cb.att.com!rizzo From: rizzo@cbnewsf.cb.att.com (anthony.r.rizzo) Newsgroups: sci.math.stat Subject: factorial design: Resolution? Message-ID: <1993Jan12.172726.7582@cbfsb.cb.att.com> Date: 12 Jan 93 17:27:26 GMT Sender: news@cbfsb.cb.att.com Distribution: na Organization: AT&T Lines: 23