Thread View: sci.math.stat
3 messages
3 total messages
Started by Rick McFarland
Fri, 06 Nov 1992 15:42
Fermat
Author: Rick McFarland
Date: Fri, 06 Nov 1992 15:42
Date: Fri, 06 Nov 1992 15:42
24 lines
1045 bytes
1045 bytes
Perhaps this news group can help ....
There is a lot of discussion in another news group about
Fermat's "Final?" Theorem
For all integers n > 2, there is NO integer solution for
n n n
A + B = C
I have heard conflicting stories that
1) A proof does not exist and Fermat died leaving behind a message
"remarkable proof!" implying that he found a simple proof.
2) A proof DOES exist but it is very complex. Thus, Fermat's simple
proof either eludes us or his "remarkable" proof was flawed.
Can anyone in this news group help? Any recent news about this?
THANKS in advance!
"omne ignotum pro magnifico"
Re: Fermat
Author: RA Sparapani RA/208/xxx gwing
Date: Fri, 06 Nov 1992 23:25
Date: Fri, 06 Nov 1992 23:25
20 lines
1356 bytes
1356 bytes
In article <2787@tymix.Tymnet.COM> rick@daffodil.tymnet.com (Rick McFarland) writes: >Perhaps this news group can help .... > >There is a lot of discussion in another news group about > > Fermat's "Final?" Theorem > >For all integers n > 2, there is NO integer solution for > n n n > A + B = C There are no integers that satisfy this relationship for n < 100000. This makes any solutions (besides 2) trivial. It may be that Fermat thought he had a proof that there are no integers besides 2 that satisfy this condition. That really would have been more interesting. Also, remember that all true statements cannot be proved(Godel's Incompleteness Theorem). Therefore, the proof of the statement that no integer besides 2 satisfies this condition may not exist. Rodney
Re: Fermat
Author: Paul S. Kedrosky
Date: Sat, 07 Nov 1992 19:47
Date: Sat, 07 Nov 1992 19:47
34 lines
2058 bytes
2058 bytes
rick@daffodil.tymnet.com (Rick McFarland) writes: > Perhaps this news group can help .... > > There is a lot of discussion in another news group about > > Fermat's "Final?" Theorem > > For all integers n > 2, there is NO integer solution for > n n n > A + B = C > > I have heard conflicting stories that > 1) A proof does not exist and Fermat died leaving behind a message > "remarkable proof!" implying that he found a simple proof. > 2) A proof DOES exist but it is very complex. Thus, Fermat's simple > proof either eludes us or his "remarkable" proof was flawed. The short answer is that no proof exists. Many have tried and all have failed. Questions about Fermat's Last Theorem seem to appear fairly regularly so a longer, more complete, answer to your question can be found in the regular FAQ posting on rec.games. Paul __________________________________________________________________________ Paul S. Kedrosky || "His soul swooned slowly as he pkedrosk@business.uwo.ca || heard the snow falling faintly through University of Western Ontario || the universe and faintly falling, London ON CANADA N6A 3K7 || like the descent of their last end, (519) 679-2111 x5174 || upon all the living and the dead." -------------------------------------------------------------------------- pkedrosk@student.business.uwo.ca (Paul S. Kedrosky) Western Business School -- London, Ontario
Thread Navigation
This is a paginated view of messages in the thread with full content displayed inline.
Messages are displayed in chronological order, with the original post highlighted in green.
Use pagination controls to navigate through all messages in large threads.
Back to All Threads