🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

2 total messages Started by mikef Thu, 12 Nov 1992 04:58
Is the logarithmic transformation monotonic?
#575
Author: mikef
Date: Thu, 12 Nov 1992 04:58
22 lines
1421 bytes
I have needed to make comparisons between variances of some
random variable X, var(X). Specifically, I needed to know if 
var(X=a)>var(X=b). However, I was only able to compute var(lnX), 
and have made the comparison between var(ln{X=a}) and var(ln{X=b}).

I thought that this comparison would be valid since: 

(1) I believed the natural logarithm was a monotonic tranformation, and

(2) because, if (1) is true I thought that it then follows that
var(X=a)>var(X=b) implies that var(ln{X=a})>var(ln{X=b}).

Am I correct? If not, any good suggestions?

Thanks in advance.  


-- 
__
Michael Fahey         | Internet: mikef@pub.health.su.oz.au
Dept of Public Health | UUCP: uunet!munnari.oz.au!pub.health.su!mikef
University of Sydney  | Bitnet: mikef%pub.health.su.oz.au@cunyvm.bitnet
Re: Is the logarithmic transformation monotonic?
#577
Author: Bill Venables
Date: Thu, 12 Nov 1992 16:36
35 lines
2156 bytes
>>>>> "Michael" == mikef <mikef@dph1.health.su.OZ.AU> writes: 

Michael> I have needed to make comparisons between variances of some random
Michael> variable X, var(X). Specifically, I needed to know if var(X=a) >
Michael> var(X=b).  However, I was only able to compute var(lnX), and have
Michael> made the comparison between var(ln{X=a}) and var(ln{X=b}).

As it stands Michael this does not really make any sense.  However if your
question amounts to the following:

"Is it true that var[log(X)] > var[log(Y)]  implies  var[X] > var[Y]  where
 X and Y are positive random variables?"

then the answer is "No, it doesn't", (even though log(x) is indeed a
monotone increasing function for positive values of x).  

Just consider a simple sample case and put, say ,

		 X = {110, 120, 130} and Y = {10, 11, 12}.

Then var[X] = 100 and var[Y] = 1 so var[X] > var[Y].  

On the other hand var[log(X)] = .0069808 and var[log(Y)] = .008316 so
var[log(X)] < var[log(Y)].

It comes about because on the one hand var[c + X] is the same for all
constants c, whereas var[log(c*X)] is the same for all positive constants
c.  By trading these off one against the other you can make the direction
of the inequalities go either way.

Bill
--
___________________________________________________________________________
Bill Venables, Dept. of Statistics, | Email: venables@stats.adelaide.edu.au
Univ. of Adelaide, South Australia. | Tel: +61 8 228 5412  Fax: ...232 5670
Thread Navigation

This is a paginated view of messages in the thread with full content displayed inline.

Messages are displayed in chronological order, with the original post highlighted in green.

Use pagination controls to navigate through all messages in large threads.

Back to All Threads