Thread View: sci.math.stat
1 messages
1 total messages
Started by Francis Lim
Wed, 06 Jan 1993 18:47
Follow-up: ACE and Splus, why transformations don't sum-up!
Author: Francis Lim
Date: Wed, 06 Jan 1993 18:47
Date: Wed, 06 Jan 1993 18:47
63 lines
2666 bytes
2666 bytes
From charlie@umnstat.stat.umn.edu Wed Jan 6 08:18 PST 1993
From: "Charles Geyer" <charlie@umnstat.stat.umn.edu>
To: flim@weber.ucsd.edu
Subject: Re: ACE (Alternating Conditional Expectations)
Newsgroups: sci.math.stat
Organization: School of Statistics, University of Minnesota
In article <1ib1luINN84d@network.ucsd.edu> you write:
>Hello netters. I have a simple ACE (Breiman and Friedman 1985) question.
>
>ACE stands for Alternating Conditional Expectations, and is a method
>of estimating the relationship between the explanatory and response
>variables, transforming the variables to maximize their correlation.
>
>The presumed relationship between Y and X, for example, is
>
> \theta(Y) = \phi(X) + e
>
>where e is random error.
>
>One can use either BLSS or S to invoke ACE.
>For both statistical packages, I found that \hat{\theta}(Y) did NOT
>equal \hat{\phi}(X), where \hat symbolizes the estimated
>transformations.
>
>In fact, \hat{\theta}(Y) was not even proportional to \hat{\phi}(X).
You said it yourself
\theta(Y) - \phi(X)
is the residuals -- random error.
You might find the output simpler to understand if you use the option
to disallow nonlinear transformations of the response. Then you get
Y = phi(X) + error
and it looks much more like the usual regression situation. You don't
then expect Y to be proportional to phi(X). [Actually it won't do this
it insists on at least a standardizing linear transformation of Y, but
the points the same.]
--
Charles Geyer
School of Statistics
University of Minnesota
charlie@umnstat.stat.umn.edu
================================================
Thanks Charles, yes it all makes sense. ACE attempts to maximize
the correlation between \theta(Y) and \phi(X).
Thus if \hat{\theta}(Y) were proportional to \hat{\phi}(X),
the sample correlation would be 1. This would happen only in
extreme cases! Thanks again.
--
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
FRANCIS W. LIM | email: flim@ucsd.edu | dept phone: (619) 534-3383
Dept of Economics, Univ of Cal at San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093-0508
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Thread Navigation
This is a paginated view of messages in the thread with full content displayed inline.
Messages are displayed in chronological order, with the original post highlighted in green.
Use pagination controls to navigate through all messages in large threads.
Back to All Threads