🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: sci.med.dentistry
Article #110

Re: BEWARE ULF'S MERCURY FIGS. (Was: Re: (no subject))

#110
From: Dagfinn Reiersol
Date: Mon, 01 Jan 1996 00:00
55 lines
2917 bytes
bsandle@southern.co.nz (Brian Sandle) wrote:


>Dagfinn Reiersol (reiersol@telepost.no) wrote:
>: The more I read your postings, the less I understand what you are
>: getting at. You keep changing the subject and the content of your
>: claims. A while ago, you said:
>: 
>: >Giving an average level for mercury uptake from food has not much 
>: >significance, I think. It is rather like giving an average level for 
>: >sound exposure. Everyone is supposed to be able to cope with average level.
>: 
>: Now, in your last posting, you're triumphantly giving us average
>: levels again:
>: 
>: >   
>: >   Daily dietary intake:   0.004 - 0.02 mg
>: > 
>: 
>: Which is it? Are average levels significant or aren't they?

>As I said, that was responding to your 31 Dec article in which you quote 
>Skare as saying:

I didn't quote Skare. Ulf did. I happen to believe Skare is right
about fecal mercury excretion from amalgam, but I don't feel like
spending time defending that point of view right now.

>>He also says: " In a recent paper by Becker and Kumpulainen (38), it was
>>reported that the average daily intake of total mercury from a normal
>>Swedish diet might be 1,8 microg Hg."

>I presume that means under 2 microgram. I don't know why he says 'might'. 
>It seems rather low compared to the figure I have found on the Web.

I'll grant you this: your fish data may well be an indication that
mercury intake from fish is higher in New Zealand.

>: You haven't disputed the WHO figures about mercury uptake from 
>: amalgam, yet now you say:
>: 
>: >And with amalgam fillings the mercury is no longer the risk since it is 
>: >locked pretty well to the silver and copper.

>Because you are telling us about the horrors of mercury and I want to 
>make it quite clear that having an amount of mercury in the mouth 
>equivalent to the amount in tooth fillings is not the same as having 
>it in amalgam form.

Of course not. Absolutely. I agree completely. We would all be dead if
that were the case.

>: You don't seem able to distinguish between toxicity and allergy:

You still don't.
Technical Details
Message-ID: <4c98g3$6uh@nms.telepost.no>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mail
References: <4bob98$5n3@newsy.ifm.liu.se> <4bqb6d$lab@orm.southern.co.nz> <4brkpa$7le@nms.telepost.no> <4buk1q$pt@orm.southern.co.nz> <4c0c08$il6@nms.telepost.no> <4c2emu$54o@orm.southern.co.nz> <4c3kaj$rf8@nms.telepost.no> <4c678i$89g@orm.southern.co.nz> <4c8j15$10c@orm.southern.co.nz>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103efd,4dd33f6957519032
X-Google-Attributes: gid103efd,public
X-Google-Thread: fd459,67a30652e41fe100
X-Google-Attributes: gidfd459,public
From: reiersol@telepost.no (Dagfinn Reiersol)
Subject: Re: BEWARE ULF'S MERCURY FIGS. (Was: Re: (no subject))
Date: 1996/01/01
Message-ID: <4c98g3$6uh@nms.telepost.no>
X-Deja-AN: 133593040
references: <4bob98$5n3@newsy.ifm.liu.se> <4bqb6d$lab@orm.southern.co.nz> <4brkpa$7le@nms.telepost.no> <4buk1q$pt@orm.southern.co.nz> <4c0c08$il6@nms.telepost.no> <4c2emu$54o@orm.southern.co.nz> <4c3kaj$rf8@nms.telepost.no> <4c678i$89g@orm.southern.co.nz> <4c8j15$10c@orm.southern.co.nz>
organization: TelePost Public Access
newsgroups: sci.med.dentistry,bionet.toxicology