Article View: sci.med.dentistry
Article #46Re: What about mercury in my mouth?
From: Denise M. Cuevas
Date: Tue, 26 Jan 1993 18:36
Date: Tue, 26 Jan 1993 18:36
54 lines
3216 bytes
3216 bytes
Responding to Len Weisberg's post requesting info on having amalgam fillings replaced: I have begun to have my mercury amalgam fillings replaced, so here's the guinea pig's point of view. There are three alternatives I know of: gold, porcelain and plastic composite. I tried the first and the third. Gold is good because it is malleable somewhat like the amalgam fillings. But gold shines in a `non-cosmetic' way and it costs a lot. My insurance will only pay the cost of amalgam fillings, so I was out of pocket a couple hundred for just one filling. It made sense, though, because it was a back tooth and the cavity was quite large, so it was like getting a cap. Porcelain is nice and white, but it isn't malleable and it won't last very long. And it costs as much as gold. Plastic composites cost about as much as amalgam and are white, but they are `installed' with a stinky (toxic?) glue and are not malleable. They are supposed to last 5 to 15 years or so. I won't get any more plastic composite fillings in the future partly because of the glue used to hold them in place and especially because they aren't malleable. If they aren't malleable, chewing can feel like someone is poking a steel rod into the exposed nerve ending in my cavity. I went back several times to have my dentist shave the composites to conform more to my bite, but the problem was never entirely resolved. I may even decide to have those removed in favor of gold. I hope there's a lot of research being done for alternative filling materials which aren't as expensive or garish as gold but which work as well as amalgam. I imagine that some of the dentists and dentist wannabes reading this newsgroup will flame me for being a weird radical and will tell me I'm paranoid. I really have done a lot of reading on mercury amalgams, pro and con, and have decided to be on the safe side. If you take precautions when handling the stuff, then I can be allowed to be paranoid about you putting it into my body. I think you're going to run across more and more folks like me, so it might be time to really rethink the fillings issue and be willing to offer good alternatives. We may be skittish about technology and some of its drawbacks (cancer?), but we still want you to cure our toothaches! We definitely want it both ways! Since I'm on the subject, I thought I'd mention that I won't be allowing myself to be x-rayed anymore. (I know, I know, the dosage is SO low...) But again, if it's not good for a human fetus, I don't care to have it done to me unless the problem were immediately life-threatening. I hope dentistry schools are encouraging students not to rely so heavily on x-rays for finding cavities. There's gotta be a better way! Denise Cuevas
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<DENISE.93Jan26183645@isl.stanford.edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!stanford.edu!EE.Stanford.EDU!ee-newsserver!deniseShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: sci.med.dentistry Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!stanford.edu!EE.Stanford.EDU!ee-newsserver!denise From: denise@isl.stanford.edu (Denise M. Cuevas) Subject: Re: What about mercury in my mouth? Message-ID: <DENISE.93Jan26183645@isl.stanford.edu> Sender: usenet@EE.Stanford.EDU (Usenet) Organization: Information Systems Lab, Stanford University Distribution: sci.med.dentistry Date: 26 Jan 93 18:36:45 Lines: 54