Article View: sci.med.laboratory
Article #40Re: Blood Borne Organism?
From: Michael Corriss
Date: Sun, 19 Mar 2000 00:00
Date: Sun, 19 Mar 2000 00:00
38 lines
3346 bytes
3346 bytes
Oops! I seem to have blindered into a hornet's nest, both off-line and on, in my first foray into these newsgroups. So I guess an explanation is in order. I work the PM shift. The morning shift takes care of the state mandated tests and if this was one of those, I would guess Microbiology already took care of it. I never see the wet tests, only the photomicrographs and the prepared slides that they leave behind for our perusal. I don't know if this was part of one the officially graded surveys. We get stuff from ASCP, CAP, and a couple of state and local societies during the year besides the required ones. I regard them as good learning experiences. This one's turning out to be such. :-) The outcry that my question has raised is actually pretty nice. I hadn't considered the idea of cheating. (If I was going that route, I would have used a pseudonym e-mail service.) It's refreshing to have experienced such a hue and cry. It's a good reflection on laboratory workers., after all, veracity is our stock and trade. I was actually wondering if I'd get any responses. I was off this weekend and Monday I have jury duty. The courthouse is just a couple of blocks from the local medical school library where I had hoped to do a periodical search since my home library is rather dated (Todd and Sanford's _Clinical Diagnosis by Lab Methods_ and _Bergey's_ are pushing 30 and my Shcmidt and Roberts _Foundations of Parasitology_ (1981) is old too, plus older stuff). Not much new research there. If this was an actual case, I would have been on the phone to the ER to the attending physician. Would have informed him there was something I didn't know present and there were a lot of them. Also would have requested a new specimen. Next Infectious Disease on-call and pathologist on-call would have been notified. I was actually hoping to start a discussion on the possibility of some kind of round Apicomplexan coccidians of the kind usually found in the gut (e.g. _Cyclospora_, _Cryptosporidium_, etc.) might be blood borne as their cousins (_Plasmodium_, _Babesia_) are. The possibility of artifact is also there.(I remember a new tech reporting a poly engulfing a filamentous bacterium in a urine micro as a trichomonad!) Depending on whether I get picked for a case, it could be a week or more before I find out what the answer may be. and nope, I don't think anyone's out of line. Sorry for chewing up the band-width with my prolixity. -mpc mcorriss@gate.net
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<38D581EE.7AB4F23C@gate.net>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<38D323FF.22DE2919@gate.net> <38D384AD.AB078D07@megsinet.net> <8b15d7$mdc$1@newsg2.svr.pol.co.uk>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 10813c,746427261bf4ed8a X-Google-Attributes: gid10813c,public X-Google-Thread: 1143b2,7a7c5a5854597f94 X-Google-Attributes: gid1143b2,public From: Michael Corriss <mcorriss@gate.net> Subject: Re: Blood Borne Organism? Date: 2000/03/19 Message-ID: <38D581EE.7AB4F23C@gate.net> X-Deja-AN: 599755234 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <38D323FF.22DE2919@gate.net> <38D384AD.AB078D07@megsinet.net> <8b15d7$mdc$1@newsg2.svr.pol.co.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Complaints-To: abuse@gate.net X-Trace: news.gate.net 953516572 31808 207.36.183.175 (20 Mar 2000 01:42:52 GMT) Organization: CyberGate, Inc. Mime-Version: 1.0 NNTP-Posting-Date: 20 Mar 2000 01:42:52 GMT Newsgroups: sci.med.laboratory,bionet.parasitology