Article View: sci.med.occupational
Article #24Re: Eye strain among programmers
From: michael jensen
Date: Mon, 31 Aug 1992 18:22
Date: Mon, 31 Aug 1992 18:22
53 lines
3005 bytes
3005 bytes
nelsonm@leela.cs.orst.edu (Michael Nelson) writes: >In <LAUB.92Aug25194952@laub.Software.Mitel.COM> laub@Software.Mitel.COM (Boniface Lau) writes: >>Does anyone have a medical explanation on why fluorescent light gives >>headache? >I think my pen test may provide insight. Try wave a pen or similar >item in from of the minitor. In many cases I notce that there is >a definite strobe affect. My dad also noticed that the early mac >screen sometimes appeared to flicker when seen through peripheral >vision (better at detecting motion). >I believe the problem may have a lot to do with the screen refresh >rate, and the flourescent lights mixing and producing a low frequency >(10hz?) light fluctiation that is detectable enough to cause strain. >Of course I could be wrong. Some study somewhere found that under fluorescent lights, many people's iris subtly contract and expand, responding to the flicker of the lights. This seems on the face or it absurd, given the lack of perceivable flicker, but since the rods&cones have "persistence of vision" effects, while the iris doesn't, it may make some sense. How the iris "perceives" light density I don't know, but that may have something to do with eyestrain/headaches under fluorescents. I hate 'em, and turn them off whenever I can. The biggest reason for fluorescent lights being so universal is that they use 10% of the power of indandescents. Now that the new long-lasting non-fluorescent low-power bulbs are on the market, that may change again. >PS. Anyone bothered by the high pitched wines that many manitors seem >to produce. There was a study done by (I think) the NIH that showed that women in particular are affected by the high-pitched whine, and that their responsivity to that frequency varied depending on their point in their cycle. No joke here, though various ones could be created. There is great variability between individuals on frequency response, as the responses in this group on this point indicate. >>-- >>Boniface Lau (613) 592-2122 ext. 3042 Boniface_Lau@Mitel.COM >>Mitel Corp. >>350 Legget Drive, Kanata >>Ontario, Canada, K2K 1X3 >-- >Michael Nelson Michael Jensen Electronic Media Manager University of Nebraska Press jensen@unlinfo.unl.edu standard disclaimers in effect
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1992Aug31.182250.9699@unlinfo.unl.edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!cis.ohio-state.edu!pacific.mps.ohio-state.edu!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!moe.ksu.ksu.edu!unlinfo.unl.edu!unlinfo!jensenReferences:
<tertium.714333371@milton> <27109@life.ai.mit.edu> <LAUB.92Aug25194952@laub.Software.Mitel.COM> <1992Aug29.055434.7834@leela.cs.orst.edu>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: sci.med.occupational Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!cis.ohio-state.edu!pacific.mps.ohio-state.edu!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!moe.ksu.ksu.edu!unlinfo.unl.edu!unlinfo!jensen From: jensen@unlinfo.unl.edu (michael jensen) Subject: Re: Eye strain among programmers Message-ID: <1992Aug31.182250.9699@unlinfo.unl.edu> Sender: news@unlinfo.unl.edu Nntp-Posting-Host: unlinfo.unl.edu Organization: University of Nebraska - Lincoln References: <tertium.714333371@milton> <27109@life.ai.mit.edu> <LAUB.92Aug25194952@laub.Software.Mitel.COM> <1992Aug29.055434.7834@leela.cs.orst.edu> Distribution: usa Date: Mon, 31 Aug 1992 18:22:50 GMT Lines: 53