Article View: sci.med.pathology
Article #101Re: Question about Hypothetical Type of Thermal Injury. Explained
From: Radium
Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2005 21:32
Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2005 21:32
90 lines
5475 bytes
5475 bytes
PD wrote: > Radium wrote: > > Bob wrote: > > > On 16 Dec 2005 22:37:41 -0800, "Radium" <glucegen1@excite.com> wrote: > > > > > > >Okay but what other symptoms would occur? Would the skin texture > > > >change? If so, how? > > > > > > By the rules you established, who knows. > > > > Why do you say that? Wouldn't denaturing the proteins cause a change in > > skin texture? I assume [but DON'T *know*] that the skin would soften > > and liquify [given that -- under my rule -- the proteins can't > > coagulate]. > > > > > I answered the melanin question because it is specific. One could > > > study this in the lab... heat melanin under conditions as desired and > > > see what happens. > > > > I've seen burn wound look 'scary' white. Sometimes it looks like white > > foam. Once, I was burnt by a hot plate. The wound did look white and > > foamy for a while. Why does this happen? [NOTE: this is NOT under my > > rules!!!] > > > > > Skin is part of a complex biological system, > > > > True. > > > > > and your groundrules > > > essentially say to ignore everything we know. > > > > How so? It is possible in injure only one organ system w/out injuring > > other systems. > But that's not what you're proposing. An "organ system" is a collection > of tissues. You are proposing damage to a specific *tissue* in an organ > system, not to the organ system. Okay. Sorry I didn't use the correct terms. > If you scratch your arm, you will see two things happen. The area > around the scratch will first turn whitish, and then it will turn red > and inflamed. Both of these are stages in a highly complex immune > response involving the release of histamines in the area of the wound. > Neither of these changes is particular to the damaged tissue itself, > but illustrates the complexity of the *organ system* that is the skin. The red is definitely due to the immune response. It is part of the inflammatory reaction. Is the 'whiteness' due to the immune response? I doubt it but I could be wrong. As I said, my burn injury [from touching a hot plate] looked white. I am not sure why the injured skin looked white. My thinking is that the heat damaged the dermal pigments in that area. Once again, I could be wrong. > In answer to your question about what would happen to your burnt > tissues in a week, it would turn black and begin to smell very bad as > bacterial decomposition sets in. I am aware of this. However, in my rules, infection or microbial decomposition canNOT occur. So if there was no bacterial [or any microbial] decay, how would the burn look like? Under my -- too good to be true in today's technology -- rules, inflammatory reactions also canNOT occur. So how would the burn look like? > See "gangrene" and "frostbite" for > what happens to dead tissue as a function of time. Already know about this. However in my rules, this would not occur. > PD > > > Of course, burning the skin would effect the rest of the > > body. The nerve endings would be stimulated they would carry info to > > the brain. The subject would then feel the pain, obviously. So yes, > > affecting the skin can INDIRECTLY affect other organs [like the brain > > in the case of tactile perception]. I never said that it wouldn't. I > > DID say that it won't *injure* other body systems. > > > > > What is the point? Sometimes people actually have a purpose for the > > > question, then contrive a question that per se makes little sense, and > > > does not lead to what is wanted anyway. > > > > Well, I am interested in the hypothetical. Its like Sci-Fi sometimes. I > > know it sounds crazy I am interested in wierd things.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1135027947.583456.283410@g44g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!postnews.google.com!g44g2000cwa.googlegroups.com!not-for-mailReferences:
<1134624719.649989.163920@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com> <tn84q1ljvhmq7ebt2q0cgsoe9hsv9quggp@4ax.com> <1134801461.449505.164360@g44g2000cwa.googlegroups.com> <hti8q1h5qtm9tqn4k253k7kcjjjcrujfu5@4ax.com> <1134846900.361690.264730@g49g2000cwa.googlegroups.com> <1135002057.830656.65920@g43g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: f60cd,bc16aeddc61a4913 X-Google-Thread: fd9c4,bc16aeddc61a4913 X-Google-Thread: 10b271,bc16aeddc61a4913 X-Google-Thread: f4886,bc16aeddc61a4913 X-Google-Thread: 105b48,bc16aeddc61a4913 X-Google-Attributes: gidf60cd,gidfd9c4,gid10b271,gidf4886,gid105b48,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!postnews.google.com!g44g2000cwa.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail From: "Radium" <glucegen1@excite.com> Newsgroups: sci.med.pathology,bionet.molbio.proteins,sci.physics,sci.chem,sci.med Subject: Re: Question about Hypothetical Type of Thermal Injury. Explained Date: 19 Dec 2005 13:32:27 -0800 Organization: http://groups.google.com Lines: 91 Message-ID: <1135027947.583456.283410@g44g2000cwa.googlegroups.com> References: <1134624719.649989.163920@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com> <tn84q1ljvhmq7ebt2q0cgsoe9hsv9quggp@4ax.com> <1134801461.449505.164360@g44g2000cwa.googlegroups.com> <hti8q1h5qtm9tqn4k253k7kcjjjcrujfu5@4ax.com> <1134846900.361690.264730@g49g2000cwa.googlegroups.com> <1135002057.830656.65920@g43g2000cwa.googlegroups.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: 69.169.18.187 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" X-Trace: posting.google.com 1135027952 19287 127.0.0.1 (19 Dec 2005 21:32:32 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2005 21:32:32 +0000 (UTC) In-Reply-To: <1135002057.830656.65920@g43g2000cwa.googlegroups.com> User-Agent: G2/0.2 X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows 98; en) Opera 8.50,gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe) Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: g44g2000cwa.googlegroups.com; posting-host=69.169.18.187; posting-account=lXUL4Q0AAAA2JxMmVRdUd7bMtBM7ensS