Article View: sci.med.pathology
Article #39Re: Thermal Burn Injury -- Why Does it Appear *White*?
From: Radium
Date: Wed, 04 Jan 2006 03:08
Date: Wed, 04 Jan 2006 03:08
23 lines
2422 bytes
2422 bytes
LEFTY wrote: > Well, you baked the water out of some collagen. > > If you burn yourself good enough, you'll hit blood vessels and then it > looks like raw hamburger. > > All you did was to bake the water out of collagen. It loses it's > translucent properties, and starts to look more like high-density > poluethylene - and it aint really all that different (generally > speaking) - collagen is just a very amazing living plastic. What do you mean by "bake the water out of"? There was no dehydration at all. The temperature of the plate wasn't high enough to dehydrate the skin in the region it touched. AFAIK, the water content in the skin of the burn region was no different from the skin on the rest of my body. So back to my question: Why did the burn look white?
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1136344083.460456.188600@g49g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!postnews.google.com!g49g2000cwa.googlegroups.com!not-for-mailReferences:
<1136143280.750000.71290@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com> <dpck1v$35d$3@rainier.uits.indiana.edu> <1136266741.421523.31930@g49g2000cwa.googlegroups.com> <1136267609.827898.125360@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: f60cd,b632b82ccde1ad4d X-Google-Thread: fd9c4,b632b82ccde1ad4d X-Google-Thread: 10b271,b632b82ccde1ad4d X-Google-Thread: f4886,b632b82ccde1ad4d X-Google-Thread: 105b48,b632b82ccde1ad4d X-Google-Attributes: gidf60cd,gidfd9c4,gid10b271,gidf4886,gid105b48,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!postnews.google.com!g49g2000cwa.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail From: "Radium" <glucegen1@excite.com> Newsgroups: sci.med.pathology,bionet.molbio.proteins,sci.physics,sci.chem,sci.med Subject: Re: Thermal Burn Injury -- Why Does it Appear *White*? Date: 3 Jan 2006 19:08:03 -0800 Organization: http://groups.google.com Lines: 24 Message-ID: <1136344083.460456.188600@g49g2000cwa.googlegroups.com> References: <1136143280.750000.71290@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com> <dpck1v$35d$3@rainier.uits.indiana.edu> <1136266741.421523.31930@g49g2000cwa.googlegroups.com> <1136267609.827898.125360@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: 69.169.18.187 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" X-Trace: posting.google.com 1136344088 9613 127.0.0.1 (4 Jan 2006 03:08:08 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 4 Jan 2006 03:08:08 +0000 (UTC) In-Reply-To: <1136267609.827898.125360@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com> User-Agent: G2/0.2 X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows 98; en) Opera 8.50,gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe) Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: g49g2000cwa.googlegroups.com; posting-host=69.169.18.187; posting-account=lXUL4Q0AAAA2JxMmVRdUd7bMtBM7ensS