Article View: sci.med.pathology
Article #51Re: Would the burn be white if its proteins did not didn't coagulate?
From: Radium
Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2006 03:22
Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2006 03:22
13 lines
2382 bytes
2382 bytes
Hero.van.Jindelt@gmx.de wrote: > PS If Radium want to turn his or someone elses skin "white": > o stay out of sun -light, especially uv-light. This turns "white" skin > brown. As I said before, I am VERY dark-skinned. You couldn't tell the difference between the color of my skin and that of bittersweet chocolate [or Oreos, for that matter]. However, the skin in the region of my finger that was burnt turned white. It was foamy-white, extremely irritating, and hot. Its texture and moisture content did not change. There was NO swelling AT ALL. I think it was a 1st-degree burn. The color of the burn region began to return to normal darkness as it healed.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1137727327.493844.272550@g44g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!postnews.google.com!g44g2000cwa.googlegroups.com!not-for-mailReferences:
<1136404116.755984.311890@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com> <1136404549.017084.43140@g43g2000cwa.googlegroups.com> <1136422108.387993.143340@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com> <38qdnY8Mnpfy71TenZ2dnUVZ_sCdnZ2d@comcast.com> <1137364541.575880.76900@g47g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: f60cd,b749b09067784e6a X-Google-Thread: fd9c4,b749b09067784e6a X-Google-Thread: 10b271,b749b09067784e6a X-Google-Thread: f4886,b749b09067784e6a X-Google-Thread: 105b48,b749b09067784e6a X-Google-Attributes: gidf60cd,gidfd9c4,gid10b271,gidf4886,gid105b48,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!postnews.google.com!g44g2000cwa.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail From: "Radium" <glucegen1@excite.com> Newsgroups: sci.med.pathology,bionet.molbio.proteins,sci.physics,sci.chem,sci.med Subject: Re: Would the burn be white if its proteins did not didn't coagulate? Date: 19 Jan 2006 19:22:07 -0800 Organization: http://groups.google.com Lines: 14 Message-ID: <1137727327.493844.272550@g44g2000cwa.googlegroups.com> References: <1136404116.755984.311890@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com> <1136404549.017084.43140@g43g2000cwa.googlegroups.com> <1136422108.387993.143340@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com> <38qdnY8Mnpfy71TenZ2dnUVZ_sCdnZ2d@comcast.com> <1137364541.575880.76900@g47g2000cwa.googlegroups.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: 69.169.18.187 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" X-Trace: posting.google.com 1137727332 17492 127.0.0.1 (20 Jan 2006 03:22:12 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2006 03:22:12 +0000 (UTC) In-Reply-To: <1137364541.575880.76900@g47g2000cwa.googlegroups.com> User-Agent: G2/0.2 X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows 98; en) Opera 8.50,gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe) Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: g44g2000cwa.googlegroups.com; posting-host=69.169.18.187; posting-account=lXUL4Q0AAAA2JxMmVRdUd7bMtBM7ensS