🚀 go-pugleaf

syncroREMOVE_TO_REPLY@pacbell.net "Roger" writes:

> Very interesting John. But all virus are made of protiens.  HIV is 
> the Human Immunodeficiency Virus.  As far as the existance of it 
> goes, you must be baiting people with that troll remark. 

"HIV" has turned out to be impossible to isolate, despite several 
attempts. There is no circumstantial evidence for it either. More 
and more reputable (even eminent) scientists now doubt whether it 
ever existed. There seems little doubt they will turn out to be 
correct. At least one large cash prize is on offer for the first 
information of a successful isolation of "HIV". It has been on 
offer for quite a while now. 

> Perhaps you might like to receive a blood donation from someone that 
> is positive just so that you could "prove yourself right."  Since you 
> don't beleive you it exists you are very likely at a high risk of 
> contracting it, that is if you ever score.  Hehehe

If I was ill enough to need a transfusion I would not care whether 
the donor was allegedly "HIV positive" or not. If he/she was "HIV 
positive" in one location, moving somewhere else would probably 
produce a negative result, as all the "HIV tests" are contradictory 
to some extent, and some combinations are mutually exclusive. It is 
not a real medical diagnosis; mere quackery. That is why it has been 
found to be such a useless diagnostic tool. Meaningless voodoo. 

As "HIV" probably does not exist, and has no significance to human 
heath even if it does (which has been established since at least 
1985), there are no genuine risks associated with it, sexual or 
otherwise. There are definite risks associated with the quack "HIV" 
diagnosis, but only the USA still panders to this kind of gross 
malpractice. Countries like the UK, for example, have long since 
abandoned the superstition. And good riddance to it! 

 John
--  
"Meanwhile, let us hope that the country is not confronted with a real 
epidemic in the near future: after the disinformation the government 
has told us about Aids, who would believe it?"
                 Andrew Neil, editor, The Sunday Times, 23 June 1996.