🚀 go-pugleaf

"Nadine" <Nadine@jps.net> wrote in message
news:3d68439f.1223093@news.cwnet.com...
> On Sat, 24 Aug 2002 21:58:43 -0400, "bbb" <pissswisher@yahoo.co.uk>
> wrote:
>
> >Nadine, why are you here?  Shouldn't you be on alt.carpet.munchers???  I
> >would recommend you return.
>
> who cares?
>
> >It would be A-OK for his name to be released now after he was found
> >guilty--HOWEVER, if he were found innocent, his career and livelihood
would
> >be over due to idiots like you.
>
> The fact is, he was convicted.  Got it?

I'm too stupid??  Please try to understand--his name was released BEFORE he
was convicted, get it?  If he were innocent, his practice would be ruined
due to his name having been released, get it?  But since he was found
guilty, it is just that his name be released now.  Get it?

>
> >Unfortunately, morons such as yourself
> >don't understand this concept, thus our society is filled with walking
> >talking excrement such as yourself.  It's sad that even Jan can see that
> >you're wrong, yet you remain blind to your foolishness.
>
> It is a not very clever attempt to shift the blame from a criminal
> sexual abuser dentist, described in the article - onto me, a
> non-criminal.

This makes no sense... perhaps you would like to edit and resubmit your
sorry attempt at an insult?

>
> You're too stupid and vulgur to reply to anymore.
> That's all for you.

Your logic is flawed and your intelligence is inferior.  I would suggest you
evaluate your comments more critically prior to posting them. (I believe the
word is 'vulgar'--and you say I'm stupid!)

What's all for me?

>
>
>
>
> >"Nadine" <Nadine@jps.net> wrote in message
> >news:3d67c827.4843843@news.cwnet.com...
> >> On Fri, 23 Aug 2002 04:15:22 -0400, Sylvia Kaplan <skaplan@nospam.com>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> What a beast.
> >> A woman has no motivation to make up such a story.
> >> .. missing info from files, the dentists story keeps
> >> changing... does not add up.
> >> Pretty sad that here on smd, there is oblique support
> >> for the suspected abuser of female patients.
> >> WHy is that?
> >>
> >> >Dentist denies he improperly touched a woman patient
> >> >DePadua is being tried in sex offense, assault case
> >> >
> >> >By Lisa Goldberg
> >> >Sun Staff
> >> >Originally published August 23, 2002
> >> >
> >> >An Ellicott City dentist denied yesterday that he ever improperly
> >> >touched a young woman in his care - although he did acknowledge
> >> >that tests he says he performed on her earlier this year were
> >> >never recorded in her medical files.
> >>
> >> Why no records?
> >>
> >> >Dr. Evan C. DePadua testified in Howard County Circuit Court that
> >> >the 22-year-old Pennsylvania woman's version of the events that
> >> >transpired on Jan. 19 - including allegations that he pulled her
> >> >pants down and rubbed her thighs while she was mildly anesthetized
> >> >and unable to react - could not have happened the way she said.
> >> >
> >> >Although a question-and-answer form he filled out at the behest
> >> >of Howard police investigators includes an admission that he
> >> >touched the woman's thigh, but "not in a sexual way," DePadua,
> >> >37, said a detective pressured him during an interview that
> >> >lasted several hours to change his answer from his original denial.
> >>
> >> Oh?  If "not in a sexual way", then "in what way"?
> >>
> >> >"They were threatening me. They were browbeating me," he said
> >> >during the second day of testimony in his trial on fourth-degree
> >> >sexual offense and misdemeanor assault charges.
> >>
> >> Oh, sob, poor molester.
> >>
> >> >Closing arguments in the case, which is being tried by Judge
> >> >Diane O. Leasure instead of a jury, are scheduled to begin this
> >> >morning.
> >>
> >> >DePadua, a Brazilian native who was first licensed as a Maryland
> >> >dentist in 1997, was the last person to testify in a case that
> >> >largely pits his word against that of the 22-year-old woman, who
> >> >had been a patient of his for more than a year at the time of the
> >> >incident.
> >> >
> >> >The Sun is not naming the woman because of the nature of the charges.
> >> >
> >> >Statements critical
> >> >
> >> >As a result, DePadua's statements to police - as well as changes
> >> >he made to his version of events and omissions in the woman's
> >> >dental files - are expected to be critical as Leasure weighs the
> >> >evidence.
> >> >
> >> >Both DePadua, who practices in the 10300 block of Baltimore
> >> >National Pike, and police investigators testified that when
> >> >confronted, the dentist at first denied ever giving the woman
> >> >nitrous oxide, then later told officers that he did.
> >>
> >> denied, then changed the story.
> >>
> >> >According to testimony, the gas dulls patients and makes them
> >> >"compliant."
> >> >
> >> >Also, DePadua wrote in the woman's medical file that he only
> >> >tightened her braces Jan. 19, but he testified that he also
> >> >performed a test for a jaw disorder and cut around two teeth
> >> >that day.
> >> >
> >> >The woman said she told her husband and brother what happened
> >> >not long after the dental visit.
> >>
> >> very difficult to do.
> >>
> >> >On Wednesday, she broke down after she testified that DePadua
> >> >at first tried to pull her pants down while she was in the
> >> >examination chair and then stood her up against a wall - all
> >> >the while increasing the nitrous oxide flow - lowered her tight
> >> >jeans and rubbed her thighs.
> >> >
> >> >DePadua broke a belt loop on her jeans during the incident,
> >> >she said.
> >> >
> >> >The nitrous oxide made her feel "out of it," she said.
> >> >
> >> >"All I could do was stand there," she said, crying. "I was
> >> >leaning against the wall. I was dizzy."
> >> >
> >> >DePadua's dentistry license has been restricted since the accusation.
> >> >
> >> >Practice restrictions
> >> >
> >> >The Maryland State Board of Dental Examiners declined last
> >> >month to suspend him while the criminal case was pending but
> >> >ordered that he not see patients alone, administer nitrous oxide
> >> >or prescribe drugs.
> >>
> >> >The order also includes details of complaints made by three
> >> >other patients of inappropriate touching and comments and of
> >> >an instance when DePadua is alleged to have left a sedated
> >> >patient alone in an examination room.
> >>
> >> Hm.. three more complaints?
> >>
> >> >None of those complaints has resulted in criminal charges.
> >> >===============================
> >>
>
>>http://www.sunspot.net/news/local/howard/bal-ho.depadua23aug23.story?coll=
b
> >al%2Dlocal%2Dhoward
> >>
> >
> >
>