🚀 go-pugleaf

Gee, I am shocked Nadine missed this point...she seems so bright.

T


"Toni" <toni4@tampabay.rr.com> wrote in message news:40da9.392269$XH.8733864@twister.tampabay.rr.com...
> > So you think the young lady in the story was ahem, bearing false
> > witness for money.  I don't think so. Know why? Cuz it was a criminal
> > case, not civil.
>
> Geez, another person who gets on here running her mouth, who doesn't have
> her light bulb screwed in all the way.  Hmm, don't you think that if he were
> found GUILTY in a criminal case, that it would make it a breeze to sue the
> pants off of him LATER in a civil case???  Of course, as the story goes, she
> didn't know that there were witnesses in the other room, hence, that was one
> lucky guy!
>
>
>
> "Nadine" <Nadine@jps.net> wrote in message
> news:3d690941.704113@news.cwnet.com...
> > On 24 Aug 2002 22:41:01 -0700, cwhite0714@fsi.net (cwhite0714) wrote:
> >
> > >Nadine@jps.net (Nadine) wrote in message
> news:<3d67c827.4843843@news.cwnet.com>...
> > >> On Fri, 23 Aug 2002 04:15:22 -0400, Sylvia Kaplan <skaplan@nospam.com>
> > >> wrote:
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> What a beast.
> > >> A woman has no motivation to make up such a story.
> > >
> > >The situation doesn't seem so simple to me.
> > >
> > >If Tony's report is correct (and I believe it could be), at least one
> > >woman and her boyfriend have been hopping around the country accusing
> > >a doctor of molesting her. Looking for money is certainly a motivation
> > >to bear false witness.
> >
> > So you think the young lady in the story was ahem, bearing false
> > witness for money.  I don't think so. Know why? Cuz it was a criminal
> > case, not civil.
> >
> > >While I would guess that the scam Tony reported is a much rarer
> >
> > Tony gets a lot of mileage out that supposed scam.  I think
> > he made it up.  Pure fiction. Total hallucination.
> >
> > >occurrence than legitimate complaints by women, it still seems unfair
> > >that even one honest person's reputation and future business would be
> > >ruined by media coverage of his or her name in the context of a
> > >sensational accusation that eventually proved false.
> >
> > Which honest persons reputation are you referring to?  The honest
> > person that lied when confronted by the womans husband and police?
> > THe honest person that was considered not credible by the judge
> > because of inconsistencies?
> >
> > >It's true that
> > >the media is liberal in reporting things that sell,
> >
> > Things that sell:
> > Paxill. Prozac.  Zoloft.
> > Hoe about some Ritalin for junior?
> >
> > >and a story about
> > >a dentist being exonerated is not likely to sell as well as the
> > >scandalous story of his possibly being guilty.
> >
> > possibly?
> >
> > >And yet, you are right about the publicizing of the accused's name
> > >being an encouragement for other victims to come forward. You are also
> > >right that what we have read doesn't add up. As the article was
> > >written, it looks very much as though the dentist is either guilty or
> > >negligent with his records, possibly both. But we do not have the
> > >whole story. We have what the newspaper reported that will sell copy.
> > >None of us would want to be tried on that unreliable "evidence."
> >
> > oh well, ahem, none of us would pull down a ladys pants during
> > an office visit either! would we?  while she was drugged?
> > So you think the news story is a fake?  C'mon!
> >
> > >I am not a dental professional; I am a patient. I am also a survivor
> > >of childhood sexual abuse. But I cannot immediately condemn this man
> > >as a molester.
> > >
> > >I find these situations too difficult and complex to judge without far
> > >more information than we have here.
> >
> > Okay, okay, don't decide.
> > You don't have to decide.  No need.  A court already has.
> >
> > maybe you didn't see this:
> >
> http://www.sunspot.net/news/custom/guns/bal-md.ho.depadua24aug24.story?coll=
> bal%2Dlocal%2Dheadlines
> >
> > "Dentist convicted in assault of patient"
> >
> > As for me, (like I said elsewhere), I'm going on facts as given
> > for this case.
> >
> > >> .. missing info from files, the dentists story keeps
> > >> changing... does not add up.
> > >> Pretty sad that here on smd, there is oblique support
> > >> for the suspected abuser of female patients.
> > >> WHy is that?
> >
> >
>
>