Article View: sci.med.prostate.prostatitis
Article #17Re: Urine lab result interpretation please. Bacterial infected or not ?
From: Fergus McClelland
Date: Mon, 08 Feb 1999 00:00
Date: Mon, 08 Feb 1999 00:00
44 lines
2344 bytes
2344 bytes
myname@village.remove.uunet.be (Geert) wrote: >On Fri, 05 Feb 1999 03:32:40 GMT, redux@perdrix.demon.co.uk (Fergus >McClelland) wrote: > >Hello, > >Thanks for your answer. But please, give me some more info. >>>I've received my latest urine lab result. >>>It was morning's first urine (first stream) + prostate fluid. > >>>With the help of my wife, by giving me for half an hour "natural >>>excitation" (no prostate massage), the prostate fluid was real present >>>at the top of my penis (causing a burning pain there). Together with >>>the first urine, this made the urine sample. >> >>The excited fluid would have been from the Cowper's Gland - unless you >>ejaculated. >I did not ejaculate. I've looked up Cowper's Gland is some books, >nothing. What is it (especially is relation to the prostate and >prostate fluid) ? It is a gland that makes preparatory fluid when sexually excited. >Does the lab result of culturing it has any value and what do they / >do they not have to find in it ? It is not the prostate, so if you had an infected prostate - but not an infected Cowper's Gland, the fluid would not bear many - if any - of the prostate pathogens you might have. > >>>Should I ask the lab (my urologist) to culture for 6 days and get me >>>an antibiogram ? >> >>Yes. > >With thanks, > > greeting, > > Geert > > >To reply by e-mail: replace "myname" by "gvnuffel" and remove the "remove." part.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<36ee549e.14770292@news.demon.co.uk>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<36b84f96.4062582@news.uunet.be> <36be49a1.1414572@news.demon.co.uk> <36bc14a3.6617693@news.uunet.be>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: f6a65,10b8bc2c49467082,start X-Google-Attributes: gidf6a65,public X-Google-Thread: fdccd,27923ae7d27636ff X-Google-Attributes: gidfdccd,public From: redux@perdrix.demon.co.uk (Fergus McClelland) Subject: Re: Urine lab result interpretation please. Bacterial infected or not ? Date: 1999/02/08 Message-ID: <36ee549e.14770292@news.demon.co.uk> X-Deja-AN: 442039754 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-NNTP-Posting-Host: perdrix.demon.co.uk:194.222.16.230 References: <36b84f96.4062582@news.uunet.be> <36be49a1.1414572@news.demon.co.uk> <36bc14a3.6617693@news.uunet.be> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Complaints-To: abuse@demon.net X-Trace: news.demon.co.uk 918443710 nnrp-10:27687 NO-IDENT perdrix.demon.co.uk:194.222.16.230 MIME-Version: 1.0 Newsgroups: sci.med.prostate.prostatitis,bionet.microbiology