🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: sci.med.prostate.prostatitis
Article #17

Re: Urine lab result interpretation please. Bacterial infected or not ?

#17
From: Fergus McClelland
Date: Mon, 08 Feb 1999 00:00
44 lines
2344 bytes
myname@village.remove.uunet.be (Geert) wrote:

>On Fri, 05 Feb 1999 03:32:40 GMT, redux@perdrix.demon.co.uk (Fergus
>McClelland) wrote:
>
>Hello,
>
>Thanks for your answer. But please, give me some more info.
>>>I've received my latest urine lab result.
>>>It was morning's first urine (first stream) + prostate fluid.
>
>>>With the help of my wife, by giving me for half an hour "natural
>>>excitation" (no prostate massage), the prostate fluid was real present
>>>at the top of my penis (causing a burning pain there). Together with
>>>the first urine, this made the urine sample.
>>
>>The excited fluid would have been from the Cowper's Gland - unless you
>>ejaculated.
>I did not ejaculate. I've looked up Cowper's Gland is some books,
>nothing. What is it (especially is relation to the prostate and
>prostate fluid) ? 

It is a gland that makes preparatory fluid when sexually excited.

>Does the lab result of culturing it has any value and what do they /
>do they not have to find in it ?

It is not the prostate, so if you had an infected prostate - but not
an infected Cowper's Gland, the fluid would not bear many - if any -
of the prostate pathogens you might have.
>
>>>Should I ask the lab (my urologist) to culture for 6 days and get me
>>>an antibiogram ?
>>
>>Yes.
>
>With thanks,
>
>	greeting,
>
>	Geert
>
>
>To reply by e-mail: replace "myname" by "gvnuffel" and remove the "remove." part. 
Technical Details
Message-ID: <36ee549e.14770292@news.demon.co.uk>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mail
References: <36b84f96.4062582@news.uunet.be> <36be49a1.1414572@news.demon.co.uk> <36bc14a3.6617693@news.uunet.be>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: f6a65,10b8bc2c49467082,start
X-Google-Attributes: gidf6a65,public
X-Google-Thread: fdccd,27923ae7d27636ff
X-Google-Attributes: gidfdccd,public
From: redux@perdrix.demon.co.uk (Fergus McClelland)
Subject: Re: Urine lab result interpretation please. Bacterial infected or not ?
Date: 1999/02/08
Message-ID: <36ee549e.14770292@news.demon.co.uk>
X-Deja-AN: 442039754
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-NNTP-Posting-Host: perdrix.demon.co.uk:194.222.16.230
References: <36b84f96.4062582@news.uunet.be> <36be49a1.1414572@news.demon.co.uk> <36bc14a3.6617693@news.uunet.be>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Complaints-To: abuse@demon.net
X-Trace: news.demon.co.uk 918443710 nnrp-10:27687 NO-IDENT perdrix.demon.co.uk:194.222.16.230
MIME-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: sci.med.prostate.prostatitis,bionet.microbiology