Article View: sci.med.psychobiology
Article #175Re: Cerebral comunication
From: Greg Stevens
Date: Mon, 12 Dec 1994 15:21
Date: Mon, 12 Dec 1994 15:21
48 lines
3463 bytes
3463 bytes
In <3cfj35$egp@calvin.st-and.ac.uk> thm1@st-andrews.ac.uk (Tomas Henrique Maul) writes: > By cerebral comunication I mean the transference of an imediate >mental state from subject A to subject B with the latter subject still >managing to perceive a fuzzy borderline between "I" and the transferred >state.... Hmmm.... well, if mental states are embodied by brain states, then since no two human brains are exactly alike, because brain structure is dependant upon the person's experiential history, no two people could ever have EXACTLY the same brain state, therefore no two people could have the same mental state. If you think that mental states can be construed as patterns in brains which are homeomorphic, though not necessarily identical, then this would not be a problem, except that for a signal to pass from one person to another there would have to be some kind of encoding system in person A to get from brain state to signal, and some decoding system in person B to get from signal to brain state, and somehow each person would have to either have a universal encoder so all of their individual brain states could be mapped onto some universal signal corresponding to that mental state and a universal decoder to map the universal signal for that mental state onto his personal brain state corresponding to it; or, each individual would have to have a decoder of person A's unique signal to person B's unique brain state. Either way it seems a bit complex. No to mention the fact that no NEW experiences or thoughts could be transferred (no thoughts/experiences not synthesized by previously experienced thoughts/feelings in B) because person B's decoding mechanism would have no way of decoding it. If you are a dualist and think that mental states are independant of brain states, then I would still argue that no two people could have the same mental states because we can do experiments (psych) to show that mental states, as well as brain states, are dependant upon an individual's experiential history, and therefore no two people can have exactly the same mental state. Take the case of deams: there is some evidence that what we experience in dreams is fragmentory and incomplete, and is filled in subconsciously when we wake up and "remember" it so that it makes sense. If this is the case, even assuming that the fragments are transmitted (which are also based on memory), it seems unlikely that the "filling in" would be the same, because this is also based on individuals' own experiences. Greg Stevens stevens@prodigal.psych.rochester.edu >
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1994Dec12.152143.13704@galileo.cc.rochester.edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!bga.com!news.sprintlink.net!sundog.tiac.net!news.kei.com!ub!galileo.cc.rochester.edu!prodigal.psych.rochester.edu!stevensReferences:
<3cfj35$egp@calvin.st-and.ac.uk>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 10d616,e757ace42a716790 X-Google-Attributes: gid10d616,public X-Google-Thread: 1045ed,e757ace42a716790 X-Google-Attributes: gid1045ed,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1994-12-12 08:07:08 PST Newsgroups: sci.med.psychobiology,bionet.neuroscience Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!bga.com!news.sprintlink.net!sundog.tiac.net!news.kei.com!ub!galileo.cc.rochester.edu!prodigal.psych.rochester.edu!stevens From: stevens@prodigal.psych.rochester.edu (Greg Stevens) Subject: Re: Cerebral comunication Message-ID: <1994Dec12.152143.13704@galileo.cc.rochester.edu> Sender: news@galileo.cc.rochester.edu Nntp-Posting-Host: prodigal.psych.rochester.edu Organization: University of Rochester - Rochester, New York References: <3cfj35$egp@calvin.st-and.ac.uk> Date: Mon, 12 Dec 94 15:21:43 GMT Lines: 51