Thread View: sci.med.vision
7 messages
7 total messages
Started by Betty Martini
Fri, 23 Feb 1996 00:00
Dr. Morgan Raiford/methanol toxicity/blindness/aspartame
Author: Betty Martini
Date: Fri, 23 Feb 1996 00:00
Date: Fri, 23 Feb 1996 00:00
154 lines
9297 bytes
9297 bytes
In interviewing the husband of Joyce Wilson who went blind and died from
NutraSweet I was given many of her records. She ran ASPARTAME VICTIMS
AND THEIR FRIENDS until her death from this poison. The late Dr. Morgan
Raiford was a specialist in methanol toxicity and many of the patients
who went blind on NutraSweet were brought to Atlanta for his diagnosis.
He was an ophthalmologist and founder of the Atlanta Eye Clinic.
Many people today say their ophthalmologists have said they were going
blind but don't know why, and diabetics in particular are thought to have
simple diabetic retinopathy. The methanol in aspartame converts to
formaldehyde in the retina of the eye. It causes retinal detachments,
blurring of the vision, double vision, floaters, flashes, black spots,
optic neuritis, tunnel vision, etc. Dr. H. J. Roberts on a radio program
recently said aspartame destroys the optic nerve.
Since we have had a hard time finding ophthalmologists that know and
can identify the problem I am providing Dr. Morgan Raiford's fact sheet.
For every physician or ophthalmologist who has this information he can
save the lives of thousands. Many times if patients had been warned off
aspartame when they were first seen they would not be blind today. Even
if you don't use aspartame (marketed as NutraSweet/Equal/Equal
Measure/Spoonful, and no telling what since the patent has expired)
please print this out and give it to your eye doctor and physician. When
Dr. Raiford wrote this NutraSweet was only in a few hundred products -
today its in 7000 products and climbing with an expired patent - in 90
countries of the world!
May 20, 1987: FACTS ABOUT ASPARTAME
The above product is also manufactured as NutraSweet. This pharmological
spin-off is as highly profitable item, with a growing market. These
products are used as a sweetener, some 200 times as sweet as regular cane
sugar.
This product has some highly toxic reactions in the human visual pathway
and we are beginning to observe the tragic damage to the OPTIC NERVE,
such as blindness, partial to total OPTIC NERVE ATROPHY. Once this
destructive process has developed there is no return of visual
restoration. We are beginning to see and observe another toxic reaction
which affects the central nervous system which is related to PHENYLALANINE
LEVELS IN THE CENTRAL NERVOUS SYSTEM. These observations are more vague,
however, it stimulates the damaging to the brain and the central nervous
system, having the manifestations as PKU NEURO DAMAGE. Over 3000 cases
have been reported and the FDA to date has ignored this existence.
(Writers Note: Now over 10,000)
HUMAN VISUAL PATHWAY DAMAGE
The human visual pathway admits ninety percent of our intellectual input
to the brain and central nervous system. All of the learning processes
are centered during ones life time. The mechanism of this tragic damage
to the human visual system from this product is and has been known for
over a decade that visual loss takes place. When this drug enters the
digestive tract, largely the upper portion, this ASPARTAME molecule spins
off a by product known as METHANOL or METHYL-ALCOHOL. This product enters
the blood stream and when these portions reach the highly metabolic
region of the OPTIC NERVE AND RETINA, PARTIAL ATROPHY CAN AND DOES TAKE
PLACE. The vision can not do without oxygen and nutrition for more than
ninety seconds without revealing some damage. Total loss of vision is
present and there is no return. In the very early stages in which is
referred to as the "wet stage", treatment can be given and will reserve
the destructive pathology to the OPTIC NERVE and RETINA. This must be in
the mind of the physician and he must understand the chemical ongoing
process. The writer has seen many cases where the patent was allowed to
go to the degrees of blindness, as this diagnosis of OPTIC NEURITIS was
rendered, as the term IDIOPATHIC NEURITIS OF OPTIC NERVE was given,
usually steroids until systemic gross body and facial moon developed.
This therapy has demonstrated the total lack of understanding of the
basic lack of BIO-CHEMICAL PHYSIOLOGY AT THE MOLECULAR LEVEL.
The variability or onset of the OPTIC NERVE ATROPHY is of a type that one
must first think of this pathology, and it requires a certain amount of
listening to the patient. The quantity of symptoms vary with each patient.
Over the past year the writer has observed the fact that any portion of
the central nervous system can and is affected. Since the chemical
PHENYLALANINE is mixed up with some metabolic mess, we have seen symptoms
of varying hue in the extremities, sensations of dullness of the
intellect, visual shadows, evidence of word structure reversing and some
hearing impairment is noted by the individual. This can and will in time
cause problems in learning. The medical community must alert itself that
we have a problem that has surfaced due to the factor of the drug
industry. Parents must be alerted to the side reactions of this toxic
product and its reactions.
Sincerely,
Morgan B. Raiford, M.D. D.Sc (Med) OPHTHALMOLOGY
We hope all reading this will take it very seriously. Almost 10 years
have past since Dr. Raiford wrote it and now we have an epidemic of
ASPARTAME DISEASE! The EPA, Dr. Gaylord, has already announced an
epidemic of MS at the World Environmental Conference where I lectured.
She said they didn't know the toxic causing it. I explained its not MS
but methanol toxicity from aspartame which mimics MS and we realize it is
now epidemic.
Please get off this poison. It is triggering neurological diseases
because it changes the brain chemistry. It changes the dopamine level of
the brain. The phenylalanine lowers the seizure threshold in the brain
and blocks serotonin, so now we have epidemic manic depression, panic
attacks, etc. Seizures are rampant.
For more information on aspartame you can use our auto-responder. Simply
email me and put sendme help in the subject line like this:
Subject: sendme help
When you get a directory simply put sendme help in the subject line again
and whatever file you want to access typed exactly as written in the
lefthand side of the directory. Example:
Subject: sendme diabetes-aspartame
Please also print out Dr. Roberts position paper on aspartame and the eye.
His tapes and books on the subject are available at 1 800 - 814-9800. Dr.
H. J. Roberts is a Board Certified Internist, endocrinologist and has been
warning diabetics, and the rest of the world off aspartame since it was
approved. He has recently published DEFENSE AGAINST ALZHEIMERS DISEASE
which has been nominated for a Pulitzer. He explains how the two
amino acids, phenylalanine and aspartic acid, isolated from the other
amino acids in protein go past the blood brain barrier and deteriorate
the neurons of the brain. This is escalating Alzheimers Disease!
You can also get EXCITOTOXINS; THE TASTE THAT KILLS by Neurosurgeon, Dr.
Russell Blaylock. (1 800 -643-2665)
Both Dr. Roberts and Dr. Blaylock explain that aspartame actually
precipitates diabetes!
Also you can check out Mark Gold's web page on aspartame:
http://www.tiac.net/users/mgold/health.html
We are revising our warning flyer that we distribute worldwide and it
will be added to the responder at a later date but if you want it as we
have it now we will be happy to email it.
Betty Martini MISSION POSSIBLE (the people warning the world to
get this poison off the planet)
*****************************************************************************
To get more information on aspartame, email betty@pd.org as follows:
Subject: sendme help
The subject line must be typed exactly like the above line.
Betty Martini 1. Take the 60-day No-Aspartame test
Mission Possible and send us your case history.
PO Box 28098 2. Tell your doctor and your friends.
Atlanta GA 30358 3. Return Aspar-Poisoned foods to the store.
USA (Nutrasweet(tm), Equal(tm), Spoonful(tm), etc)
We are dedicated to the proposition that we will not be satisfied until death
and disability are no longer considered an acceptable cost of business.
Re: Dr. Morgan Raiford/methanol toxicity/blindness/aspartame
Author: James R. Bunch
Date: Fri, 23 Feb 1996 00:00
Date: Fri, 23 Feb 1996 00:00
15 lines
1508 bytes
1508 bytes
Betty Martini <betty@noel.pd.org> wrote: [Lots & lots &lots of drivel deleted] BS-Betty strikes again! If we _have_ to have a CDA, why can't our congressional bozo's point it at BS-B's sort of stuff? You can be sure it does a lot more harm than anything you'll see in alt.sex.kinky_stuff! -- ----------------------------- James R. Bunch "A Byte is a terrible thing to waste ... jbunch@primenet.com ... a MByte 1048576 times worse" PGP Key available via finger PGP Key fingerprint = B5 31 10 77 BF B0 FD B2 10 54 CB E6 13 7C 26 58 ------------------------------
Re: Dr. Morgan Raiford/methanol toxicity/blindness/aspartame
Author: Betty Martini
Date: Sat, 24 Feb 1996 00:00
Date: Sat, 24 Feb 1996 00:00
36 lines
2923 bytes
2923 bytes
Dear James: What have you got against Dr. Morgan Raiford? He was "the specialist" in methanol toxicity in the United States! Many of the patients who went blind on NutraSweet were brought to Atlanta for him to diagnose. He testified before Congress and asked that NutraSweet be banned. He was an outstanding and renowned ophthalmologist who founded the Atlanta Eye Clinic. Even back in the 60's when I worked for a group of 11 physicians anyone who had a serious eye problem was always referred to Dr. Raiford. Most people would be glad to be warned that there is a product in 7000 products that destroys the optic nerve, and the nervous system, and they would appreciate a report by someone tops in their field. Lost of sight is a serious thing. Lee Fuller came to see me some weeks ago after reading the article I wrote about Joyce Wilson who went blind and died on NutraSweet. There were tears in her eyes when she said: "I have her same symptoms and I'm going blind. How could they not warn us? Please help me so I can warn others." It seems inconceivable that someone would get upset that people are warned so they can save their health and their sight. What is your agenda that you would not want them to have this information? Betty ***************************************************************************** To get more information on aspartame, email betty@pd.org as follows: Subject: sendme help The subject line must be typed exactly like the above line. Betty Martini 1. Take the 60-day No-Aspartame test Mission Possible and send us your case history. PO Box 28098 2. Tell your doctor and your friends. Atlanta GA 30358 3. Return Aspar-Poisoned foods to the store. USA (Nutrasweet(tm), Equal(tm), Spoonful(tm), etc) We are dedicated to the proposition that we will not be satisfied until death and disability are no longer considered an acceptable cost of business.
Re: Dr. Morgan Raiford/methanol toxicity/blindness/aspartame
Author: Brainman
Date: Mon, 26 Feb 1996 00:00
Date: Mon, 26 Feb 1996 00:00
41 lines
2552 bytes
2552 bytes
In article <Pine.SUN.3.91.960224183508.9978A-100000@noel.pd.org>,
betty@noel.pd.org (aka BS-Betty) says...
>
>Dear James: What have you got against Dr. Morgan Raiford? He was "the
>specialist" in methanol toxicity in the United States!
[stuff deleted]
>Most people would be glad to be warned that
[more stuff deleted]
>It seems inconceivable that someone would get upset that people are
>warned so they can save their health and their sight. What is your agenda
>that you would not want them to have this information?
>
>Betty
>
I beleive you have let your propaganda campaign against aspartame cloud your
vision. A great problem in this country is that tunnel-visioned "lobbyists'
such as yourself paint a gloomy picture that only tells half the tale. What
you so strongly state as _fact_ is merely Dr. Raiford's _OPINION_.
Furthermore, it is disgusting that the lay public are so entranced by your
hogwash. It is quite harmful to the average citizens of our country that
such "doomsday" banter receives such notice.
Besides, how do we know that alledged "aspartame-blindness" is not the
result of "bad genes" and these people are merely being "weeded-out?"
Take your meaningless discourse somewhere else.
_______________________________________
N. Keele
UTMB - Pharmacology J-31
Galveston, TX 77555-1031
-------------------------------------------------------
"Once in awhile you get shown the light
In the strangest of places
If you look at it right."
--JG (1942-1995)
-------------------------------------------------------
Re: Dr. Morgan Raiford/methanol toxicity/blindness/aspartame
Author: Michael Giddings
Date: Mon, 26 Feb 1996 00:00
Date: Mon, 26 Feb 1996 00:00
43 lines
3144 bytes
3144 bytes
In <4gsm7r$7l5@atlantis.utmb.edu> Brainman wrote: > I beleive you have let your propaganda campaign against aspartame cloud your > vision. A great problem in this country is that tunnel-visioned "lobbyists' > such as yourself paint a gloomy picture that only tells half the tale. Tunnel-visioned lobbyists? Oh, yeah, I'm sure there are NONE of THOSE representing the makers of products such as Nutra Sweet. In fact, I'm sure the multi-billion dollar company behind Nutra-Sweet has no reason to try to protect its interests as best it can. Why would they? Of course, you're right. I've got the picture now. We've been fed by hoax after hoax by these "tunnel vision" lobbyists. The last one was the big anti-smoking propaganda campaign. Of course, all those tunnel-visioned lobbyists were simply propagating "doomsday" banter . Just listen to the tobacco company execs for the truth, "Tobacco has not been proven to cause cancer". Hmm, I'm going to have to take up smoking AND drinking lots of Diet Coke now, thanks to you. > Besides, how do we know that alleged "aspartame-blindness" is not the > result of "bad genes" and these people are merely being "weeded-out?" > Too bad they haven't yet identified the gene that causes irresponsible, obnoxious posts. There should be a screening test for it before they allow people (such as yourself) on the internet. [Translation for the sarcasm impaired: Betty may be right or wrong. At least she is posting something which resembles information, unlike the flames which followed. Anyone actually care to respond with real scientific arguments, as opposed to flame baiting, to what she has to say?]. -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- - Michael Giddings \ DNA analysis techniques UW Madison Dept. of Chemistry \ set job "Consultant and Graduate Student" Madison, Wisconsin \ set specialty "Scientific Computation" (608) 692-2851 \ set InRealLife "Whitewater kayaker and\ giddings@whitewater.chem.wisc.edu or\ outdoor enthusiast" giddings@students.wisc.edu \ ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- --
Re: Dr. Morgan Raiford/methanol toxicity/blindness/aspartame
Author: Garland Franklin
Date: Wed, 28 Feb 1996 00:00
Date: Wed, 28 Feb 1996 00:00
8 lines
1385 bytes
1385 bytes
>[Translation for the sarcasm impaired: Betty may be right or wrong. At >least she is posting something which resembles information, unlike the >flames which followed. Anyone actually care to respond with real scientific >arguments, as opposed to flame baiting, to what she has to say?]. It's interesting that I've never seen any lawsuits against NutraSweet, Dt Coke, etc. I mean, after hearing all of this, every time a pop the tab it's like playing the lotto. If I start going blind, I sue!
Re: Dr. Morgan Raiford/methanol toxicity/blindness/aspartame
Author: unidextr
Date: Wed, 28 Feb 1996 00:00
Date: Wed, 28 Feb 1996 00:00
18 lines
1700 bytes
1700 bytes
On 26 Feb 1996 22:43:52 GMT, giddings@menominee.menominee.chem.wisc.edu (Michael Giddings) wrote: < <[Translation for the sarcasm impaired: Betty may be right or wrong. At <least she is posting something which resembles information, unlike the <flames which followed. Anyone actually care to respond with real scientific <arguments, as opposed to flame baiting, to what she has to say?]. You sem to have said it all in your translation of the lady's ravings - she is posting "...something which resembles information,...." that says it all there is no need to respond to something that "resembles" information with scientific facts - you just have to fabrixcate something that "resembles" scientific facts to balance the garbage she posts that "resembles" information! Well put!
Thread Navigation
This is a paginated view of messages in the thread with full content displayed inline.
Messages are displayed in chronological order, with the original post highlighted in green.
Use pagination controls to navigate through all messages in large threads.
Back to All Threads