Article View: sci.military
Article #11627Re: Space based combat--the next frontier
From: Howard Berkey
Date: Tue, 26 Jan 1993 17:45
Date: Tue, 26 Jan 1993 17:45
57 lines
3187 bytes
3187 bytes
From howard@netcom.com (Howard Berkey) This is an interesting topic for many reasons. To limit the scope a little, how about trying to make some assumptions: 1. There must be something to fight over As Douglas Adams said, Space is a big place. Really big. Therefore, the chance of an encounter in deep space should be relatively small. Most fights would probably take place either in orbit or near a station or asteroid in orbit. Another reason for this is that it's relatively hard for large masses to leave orbit, and thus any defender would be unlikely to spend large amounts of energy leaving the valuble object they are defending (planet, station, asteroid) but would rather let the attacker come to them. They would also benefit from hiding in a planet's electromagnetic/gravity/heat fields and thus defeat several kinds of passive detection. 2. Orbital velocities are large And this means that ships would likely be closing on each other very rapidly. An obvious consequence of this is that kinetic weapons would be very effective. For example, a large number of ball bearings laid out in your opponent's path would have roughly the same effect on his ship as a claymore mine on an infantry squad. It also meand that once ships were commited to combat, disengagement would be difficult. Another ramification is that it would be as easy for a frigate to kill a battleship as another frigate, since all that really matters is scoring a 'hit'. Large ships would actually be at a disadvantage, since the delta-vee required to move them would be larger. For this reason, I think ships would tend to be smaller. 3. Most seeker weapons would be nuclear For obvious reasons, if a seeker weapon was to be used a large warhead is a must due to the distances involved. Large direct-fire weapons would be impractical since they could be defeated by altering velocities. High-volume fire would be effective in a manner similar to the ball-bearing minefield described above, so weapons similar to Phalanx cannons in an offensive mode would be far more effective than big guns. This is another factor which favors small ship design. And a small ship could carry externally large numbers of nuclear guided missiles. Or submunitions. Comments? -Howard -- :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: Howard Berkey howard@netcom.com "I AM the Lizard Queen" - Lisa Simpson ... .. ... ... .. ... ... .. ... ... .. ... ... .. ... ... .. ...
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<C1H2oJ.Es9@law7.DaytonOH.NCR.COM>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!charon.amdahl.com!pacbell.com!ames!haven.umd.edu!darwin.sura.net!gatech!hubcap!ncrcae!ncrhub2!ciss!law7!militaryReferences:
<C1D842.95p@law7.DaytonOH.NCR.COM> <C1F7B8.LFH@law7.DaytonOH.NCR.COM>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: sci.military Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!charon.amdahl.com!pacbell.com!ames!haven.umd.edu!darwin.sura.net!gatech!hubcap!ncrcae!ncrhub2!ciss!law7!military From: howard@netcom.com (Howard Berkey) Subject: Re: Space based combat--the next frontier Message-ID: <C1H2oJ.Es9@law7.DaytonOH.NCR.COM> Sender: military@law7.DaytonOH.NCR.COM (Sci.Military Login) Organization: Netcom Online Communications Services (408-241-9760 login: guest) References: <C1D842.95p@law7.DaytonOH.NCR.COM> <C1F7B8.LFH@law7.DaytonOH.NCR.COM> Date: Tue, 26 Jan 1993 17:45:55 GMT Approved: military@law7.daytonoh.ncr.com Lines: 58