Thread View: sci.military
20 messages
20 total messages
Started by Stefan Kronkvist INF
Thu, 21 Jan 1993 18:41
Carrier info.wanted !
Author: Stefan Kronkvist INF
Date: Thu, 21 Jan 1993 18:41
Date: Thu, 21 Jan 1993 18:41
24 lines
1346 bytes
1346 bytes
From Stefan Kronkvist INF <skronkvi@aton.abo.fi> Hello! I am looking for general aircraft-carrier information. 1) How many carriers do UK,USA and France have? (names if possible) 2) What kind of aircrafts are they using at their carriers? 3) What kind of defensive weaponry is usually fitted on a carrier (exept for the planes of course)? 4) Did UK use their carrier(s) at the 'Falklands-War'? 5) When is the average western carrier built (-50:s -60:s ...)? 6) Are there any major differenses between British,French and US carriers. If you have some information,please post it.All information will be apprissiated. -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Stefan Kronkvist skronkvi@aton.abo.fi Abo Akademi University Finland --------------------------------------------------------------------------
Re: Carrier info.wanted !
Author: Don Palmrose
Date: Fri, 22 Jan 1993 17:41
Date: Fri, 22 Jan 1993 17:41
85 lines
3437 bytes
3437 bytes
From Don Palmrose <dpe@inel.gov> In article <C17vx9.F80@law7.DaytonOH.NCR.COM>, Stefan Kronkvist INF <skronkvi@aton.abo.fi> writes: > > I am looking for general aircraft-carrier information. > > 1) How many carriers do UK,USA and France have? (names if possible) For US carriers, I'm not quite sure how many are left but I'll give it a shot (I don't have a Jane's Fighting Ship handy) Saratoga, Forrestal, Enterprise, Ranger, Kitty Hawk, Independence, Kennedy, Nimitz, Vinson, Eisenhower, Roosevelt, Lincoln Am I missing 2 more? Lexington may only be used for training now. [mod note -- Lexingtion is going to be de-commissioned (or may have been already, and Forrestal is taking her place. You missed the Constellation (part of the JFK/Kitty Hawk class) Midway was on it's way back from Japan to be de-commissioned Steve] > 2) What kind of aircrafts are they using at their carriers? US naval aircraft are: F-14 interceptor F/A-18 fighter/bomber A-6 bomber EA-6B electronic countermeasures S-3 ASW turbojet aircraft SH-3 ASW helo SH-60 ASW helo E-3 early warning radar plane C-2 cargo/transport plane > 3) What kind of defensive weaponry is usually fitted on a carrier (exept > for the planes of course)? US carriers have: Phalanx CIWS NATO Sea Sparrow Older ships might have 2 to 4 5"Mk48s if they have not been removed > 4) Did UK use their carrier(s) at the 'Falklands-War'? Yes > 5) When is the average western carrier built (-50:s -60:s ...)? All US carriers are now from the mid-1950's and later. > 6) Are there any major differenses between British,French and US carriers. Yes, the US carriers are much bigger coming in at about 96K tons fully loaded. > > -------------------------------------------------------------------------- > Stefan Kronkvist skronkvi@aton.abo.fi > Abo Akademi University > Finland > -------------------------------------------------------------------------- > Don Palmrose "There are only two kinds of ships.... Those that project power onto shore and those that either protect or support the power projectors." ========== long legal disclaimer follows, press n to skip =========== Neither the United States Government or the Idaho National Engineering Laboratory or any of their employees, makes any warranty, whatsoever, implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility regarding any information, disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. No specific reference constitutes or implies endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the United States Government or the Idaho National Engineering Laboratory. The views and opinions expressed herein do not necessarily reflect those of the United States Government or the Idaho National Engineering Laboratory, and shall not be used for advertising or product endorsement purposes.
Re: Carrier info.wanted !
Author: david.r.wells
Date: Sun, 24 Jan 1993 15:52
Date: Sun, 24 Jan 1993 15:52
74 lines
3072 bytes
3072 bytes
From "david.r.wells" <drw@cbnewsg.cb.att.com> In article <C17vx9.F80@law7.DaytonOH.NCR.COM> Stefan Kronkvist INF <skronkvi@aton.abo.fi> writes: > >Hello! > >I am looking for general aircraft-carrier information. > >1) How many carriers do UK,USA and France have? (names if possible) UK: 3, Invincible, Illustrious and Ark Royal. USA: A bunch. Let's see: CV-59, USS Forrestal (now our training carrier) CV-60, USS Saratoga CV-61, USS Ranger CV-62, USS Independence CV-63, USS Kitty Hawk CV-64, USS Constellation CVN-65, USS Enterprise CV-66, USS America CV-67, USS John F. Kennedy CVN-68, USS Nimitz CVN-69, USS Eisenhower CVN-70, USS Carl Vinson CVN-71, USS Theodore Roosevelt CVN-72, USS Lincoln CVN-73, USS Washington I guess that makes 14, plus 1 training carrier. Midway is in reserve. Coral Sea may not be long for this world. France: 2: Foch, Clemanceau. I believe that they are being replaced by the de Gaulle class later this decade. >2) What kind of aircrafts are they using at their carriers? UK: Harriers & Helicopters USA: F-14, F/A-18, A-6, E-2, S-3, plus helicopters France: Etandards, F-8 Crusaders, plus helicopters >3) What kind of defensive weaponry is usually fitted on a carrier (exept > for the planes of course)? UK: Sea Dart, probably some other stuff. USA: Sea Sparrow III, Phalanx (usually 3 each) France: 100mm guns, probably some other stuff. >4) Did UK use their carrier(s) at the 'Falklands-War'? They sure did! >5) When is the average western carrier built (-50:s -60:s ...)? These are guesses. "average" is difficult to judge here. UK: early '80s USA: '60s (We have had a constant, if slow, building program) As the '50s vintage Forrestals, and perhaps some of the Kitty Hawks are retired, this figure will change. France: '60s >6) Are there any major differenses between British,French and US carriers. Huge ones. US carriers are BIG and operate heavy strike aircraft, launched from catapults and landed with tailhooks. UK carriers are FAR smaller, and launch their Harriers off of a ski jump, and land them vertically. French carriers use the catapult and tailhook scheme, but the ships and aircraft are smaller than their American counterparts. > >If you have some information,please post it.All information will be >apprissiated. > Haven't you ever heard of Jane's Fighting Ships? Check your local library. You'll get far better info than you'll get from me working from memory. David R. Wells
Re: Carrier info.wanted !
Author: aggie
Date: Sun, 24 Jan 1993 15:56
Date: Sun, 24 Jan 1993 15:56
25 lines
1389 bytes
1389 bytes
From aggie@wealthy.ocean.fsu.edu > From Don Palmrose <dpe@inel.gov> > Am I missing 2 more? Lexington may only be used for training now. > > [mod note -- Lexingtion is going to be de-commissioned (or may have been > already, and Forrestal is taking her place. > > You missed the Constellation (part of the JFK/Kitty Hawk class) > > Midway was on it's way back from Japan to be de-commissioned > > Steve] According to my recollection of one of the posts appearing here, AVT-16 _Lexington_ has already been decomissioned and scraped. Can anyone confirm or deny that? I would assume _Forrestal_ is already on duty, but I haven't had a chance to drive up to Pensacola lately. James
Re: Carrier info.wanted !
Author: Neil Schellenberger
Date: Sun, 24 Jan 1993 15:59
Date: Sun, 24 Jan 1993 15:59
31 lines
1493 bytes
1493 bytes
From Neil Schellenberger <schellen@mprgate.mpr.ca>
In article <C19nsK.39L@law7.DaytonOH.NCR.COM> Don Palmrose <dpe@inel.gov> writes:
> 2) What kind of aircrafts are they using at their carriers?
US naval aircraft are:
F-14 interceptor
F/A-18 fighter/bomber
A-6 bomber
EA-6B electronic countermeasures
S-3 ASW turbojet aircraft
SH-3 ASW helo
SH-60 ASW helo
E-3 early warning radar plane
^^^
That would be ... "interesting" ;-)
I realize that this is probably just a typo, but I think that the
dedicated AEW plane in use on US CVs is the E-2C Hawkeye. I believe the
E-3 is the Sentry.
Regards,
Neil
--
Neil Schellenberger | Voice : (604) 293-5438
MPR Teltech Ltd. | Fax : (604) 293-5787
8999 Nelson Way, Burnaby, BC | E-Mail: schellen@mpr.ca
Canada, V5A 4B5 | "Wibble!" - Blackadder II ("Head")
Re: Carrier info.wanted !
Author: Steven.Schultz
Date: Sun, 24 Jan 1993 16:03
Date: Sun, 24 Jan 1993 16:03
42 lines
2453 bytes
2453 bytes
From Steven.Schultz <Steven.Schultz@mixcom.mixcom.com> In <C19nsK.39L@law7.DaytonOH.NCR.COM> Don Palmrose <dpe@inel.gov> writes: >Saratoga, Forrestal, Enterprise, Ranger, Kitty Hawk, Independence, >Kennedy, Nimitz, Vinson, Eisenhower, Roosevelt, Lincoln >Am I missing 2 more? Lexington may only be used for training now. >[mod note -- Lexingtion is going to be de-commissioned (or may have been >already, and Forrestal is taking her place. >You missed the Constellation (part of the JFK/Kitty Hawk class) >Midway was on it's way back from Japan to be de-commissioned >Steve] Also: George Washington and America. U.S.S. Lexington (AVT 16) had her last aircraft landing in February 1991, No. 493,248. In March, 1991, it was decided to decommission the ship because of maintenence problems. It was stricken November 30, 1991, and is now a display at Corpus Christi, TX. It was replaced by U.S.S. Forrestal, redesignated AVT 59 on February 4, 1992, after completing her last deployment with Carrier Air Wing 6 (CVW 6) from Mayport, FL. She left in May 1991, and returned that December. The ship entered a complex overhaul at the Phillidelphia Naval Yard in September 1992, and is scheduled to complete November, 1993. Most work will be removal of weapons and sensors. U.S.S. Midway (CV 41) was decommissioned April 11, 1992. The ship left her long time homeport of Yokosuka, Japan, August 10, 1991. The ship began stand-down October 1, 1991, after Operation Desert Storm. She is mothballed in Pacific Fleet Reserve, I believe in Washington. She is mothballed with the capability to relieve the Forrestal as AVT if Forrestal is returned to service because of emergency. >Older ships might have 2 to 4 5"Mk48s if they have not been removed No carriers are fitted with them. -- Steve Schultz Steven.Schultz@mixcom.com
Re: Carrier info.wanted !
Author: bull
Date: Mon, 25 Jan 1993 17:23
Date: Mon, 25 Jan 1993 17:23
145 lines
6091 bytes
6091 bytes
From bull@vaxc.cc.monash.edu.au
> From Don Palmrose <dpe@inel.gov>
> Stefan Kronkvist INF <skronkvi@aton.abo.fi> writes:
>>
>> I am looking for general aircraft-carrier information.
>>
>> 1) How many carriers do UK,USA and France have? (names if possible)
>
> For US carriers, I'm not quite sure how many are left but I'll give it a shot
> (I don't have a Jane's Fighting Ship handy)
>
> Saratoga, Forrestal, Enterprise, Ranger, Kitty Hawk, Independence,
> Kennedy, Nimitz, Vinson, Eisenhower, Roosevelt, Lincoln
>
> Am I missing 2 more? Lexington may only be used for training now.
>
> [mod note -- Lexingtion is going to be de-commissioned (or may have been
> already, and Forrestal is taking her place.
>
> You missed the Constellation (part of the JFK/Kitty Hawk class)
>
> Midway was on it's way back from Japan to be de-commissioned
I'll add a few more notes. There are 4(?) conventionally powered
"Forrestal" class carriers (oil fired steam boilers), built in the '50's.
All other currently serving carriers are nuclear powered. There are 2
other conventionally powered carriers, Midway and Coral Sea, but they have
been removed from service and are scheduled to be scrapped. There is at
least 1 new carrier due to enter service soon, USS George Washington, and
another under construction, possibly ready by 1996, both based on the
"Nimtz" design.
[mod note -- From all the other posting, here is the "canonical" list
of U.S. Carriers currently being used:
Ship Class Propulsion
---------- ---------- -----------------
Forrestal Forrestal Oil (note -- used as training carrier)
Ranger Forrestal Oil
Saratoga Forrestal Oil
Independence Forrestal Oil
JFK JFK/Kitty Hawk Oil
Constellation JFK/Kitty Hawk Oil
America JFK/Kitty Hawk Oil
Kitty Hawk JFK/Kitty Hawk Oil
Enterprise Enterprise Nuclear
Nimitz Nimitz Nuclear
Eisenhower Nimitz Nuclear
Vinson Nimitz Nuclear
Roosevelt Nimitz Nuclear
Lincoln Nimitz Nuclear
List does not include carriers under construction or not yet commissioned.
As you can see, there are more than 4 conventionally powered carriers
Steve]
France has 2 conventionally powered carriers, Clememceau (sp?)
and Foch, and 1 nuclear powered carrier under construction (with plans
for a second nuclear carrier) called Charles DeGaulle.
England has 3 Invincible class carriers, with no immediate
plans for replacing them. All 3 carriers are conventionally powered
using turbines. Names: Invincible, Illustrious, ?.
>> 2) What kind of aircrafts are they using at their carriers?
>
> US naval aircraft are:
> F-14 interceptor
> F/A-18 fighter/bomber
> A-6 bomber
> EA-6B electronic countermeasures
> S-3 ASW turbojet aircraft
> SH-3 ASW helo
> SH-60 ASW helo
> E-3 early warning radar plane
> C-2 cargo/transport plane
France: F-8 Crusader Fighter
Super Etendard Attack
Alize Anti-sub plane
Super Frelon Anti-sub helicopter
Lynx (?) Anti-sub helicopter
on the Degaulle: Rafael-M (sp?) (marine version) Fighter/Attack
Helicopters unknown
England: Sea Harrier Fighter/Attack
Sea King Anti-sub helicopter
Sea King AEW Airborn Early Warning helicopter
>> 3) What kind of defensive weaponry is usually fitted on a carrier (exept
>> for the planes of course)?
>
> US carriers have:
> Phalanx CIWS
> NATO Sea Sparrow
> Older ships might have 2 to 4 5"Mk48s if they have not been removed
France: 4 100mm guns. I think a short range missile as well.
on the Degaulle: unknown.
England. 1 Sea Dart medium range missle launcher.
2 GoalKeeper CIWS (based on the US GAU-8, 30mm
gatling gun)
>> 4) Did UK use their carrier(s) at the 'Falklands-War'?
>
> Yes
England sent HMS Invincible and HMS Hermes. Hermes was an
older design, converted to carry Sea Harriers, and has been sold to
India, where it is the Indian Navy flagship.
>> 5) When is the average western carrier built (-50:s -60:s ...)?
>
> All US carriers are now from the mid-1950's and later.
Both French carriers were built in the late 50's.
The English carriers were built in the 70's
>> 6) Are there any major differenses between British,French and US carriers.
>
> Yes, the US carriers are much bigger coming in at about 96K tons fully loaded.
Basically true. No other country has as many carriers as the US,
and no-one has carriers of a similar size to even the smaller Forrestal
class carriers. The French carriers are considered to be "Light" carriers.
The English carriers are classed CVV (vertical *landing* aircraft only,
helicopters and Harrier "jump jets"). Even the DeGaulle, when finished,
will be a "medium" sized carrier.
Other countries with CVV's are Spain (2), Italy (1), Russia (5 plus
1 incomplete).
This discussion also hasn't mentioned the US Wasp class, heavy
assault ships (1 launched, 1 building, 2 more to follow) which are
supposed to have a secondary role of "sea control" where they can act as
light carriers using AV-8B Harrier jets and Seahawk anti-sub helicopters.
Bull@vaxc.cc.monash.edu.au OR bull@monu1.cc.monash.oz
DOD# 251 '84 VF 750 Closet Ducatisto
Disclaimer. If you love your llama, let it lambada.
Re: Carrier info.wanted !
Author: Erik Svensson FOA2
Date: Mon, 25 Jan 1993 17:23
Date: Mon, 25 Jan 1993 17:23
24 lines
1350 bytes
1350 bytes
From eriks@lin.foa.se (Erik Svensson FOA2)
>From aggie@wealthy.ocean.fsu.edu
>According to my recollection of one of the posts appearing here, AVT-16
>_Lexington_ has already been decomissioned and scraped. Can anyone
>confirm or deny that?
>I would assume _Forrestal_ is already on duty, but I haven't had a
>chance to drive up to Pensacola lately.
According to World Air Power's book about US naval aviation, _Forrestal_ is
now AVT-59 and _Lexington_ out of commission. It's a very good book, btw.
cheers
--
Erik Svensson
Research Officer National Defense Research Establishment (FOA)
Guided Weapons Division Stockholm, Sweden eriks@fenix.lin.foa.se
"The problem with the future is that it keeps turning into the present"
-- Hobbes
Re: Carrier info.wanted !
Author: Thomas Richard Hubbard
Date: Mon, 25 Jan 1993 17:23
Date: Mon, 25 Jan 1993 17:23
24 lines
1258 bytes
1258 bytes
From trh2m@kelvin.seas.Virginia.EDU (Thomas Richard Hubbard) In article <C1D840.94v@law7.DaytonOH.NCR.COM> "david.r.wells" <drw@cbnewsg.cb.att.com> writes: >USA: A bunch. Let's see: >CV-59, USS Forrestal (now our training carrier) >CV-60, USS Saratoga >CV-61, USS Ranger >CV-62, USS Independence >CV-63, USS Kitty Hawk >CV-64, USS Constellation >CVN-65, USS Enterprise >CV-66, USS America >CV-67, USS John F. Kennedy >CVN-68, USS Nimitz >CVN-69, USS Eisenhower >CVN-70, USS Carl Vinson >CVN-71, USS Theodore Roosevelt >CVN-72, USS Lincoln These don't count as commissioned ships, but the _USS United States_ and the _USS Stenis_ are under construction at Newport News Shipbuilding. Tom Hubbard
Re: Carrier info.wanted !
Author: TWZ101
Date: Mon, 25 Jan 1993 17:30
Date: Mon, 25 Jan 1993 17:30
43 lines
2600 bytes
2600 bytes
From TWZ101@psuvm.psu.edu
Other nations with aircraft carriers include:
India: 2 (Vikrant/Viraat)
Argentina: 1 (Vienticinco de Mayo)
Brazil: 1 (Minas Gerias)
Italy: 1 (Giuseppe Garibaldi)
Spain: 1 (Principe de Austurias)
The Italian and Spanish ships are ski-jump equipped for operating both
helicopters and Harriers; the Brazillian and Argentinean ships are getting old
and probably nearing retirement (we saw how effective the Argie ship was in
the Falklands in '82). The Indian vessels are also getting old, and reports
are that a replacement for one of them is under construction.
Both Japan and Thailand have been tossing around the idea of acquiring
some form of small carrier/helo assault ship, and it seems that eventually the
Japanese will get one, but not for several years.
The former Soviet Republics also have a number of carrier-type vessels in
various stages of disrepair.
2 x Moskva Class (Moskva and Lenningrad)--very old, close to retirement--
operate only KA-25/27 helicopters
4 x Kiev Class (Kiev, Novorosysk, Minsk, Kharkov(?))--early/mid-1970s
ships with ski-jumps for Yak-38 "Forgers" and ASW helos; some
of these are in awful states of repair and need immediate over-
hauls or scrapping
1 x Admrial Kuznetsov--full deck carrier, but I believe it has a ski-jump
as well; operates 40-50 aircraft, Su-27K is main fighter; now
under Russian control
1 x Varyag--Still under construction, I think under Ukrainian control;
reports last year said it was to be sold to China, but all
parties involved deny it; would need lots of work to get
functional
1 x ??--nuclear powered carrier under construction?
1 x ??--conventional powered carrier under con., like Kuznetsov
T.Z.
"Knowledge, was it worth such torment/
To see the far side of shadow?"--G.T.
Training Carrier Pilots (was: Carrier info.wanted )
Author: I R A Aggie
Date: Mon, 25 Jan 1993 17:31
Date: Mon, 25 Jan 1993 17:31
24 lines
1784 bytes
1784 bytes
From I R A Aggie <aggie@wealthy.ocean.fsu.edu> > From Steven.Schultz <Steven.Schultz@mixcom.mixcom.com> > Also: George Washington and America. U.S.S. Lexington (AVT 16) had her last > aircraft landing in February 1991, No. 493,248. In March, 1991, it was decided > to decommission the ship because of maintenence problems. It was stricken > November 30, 1991, and is now a display at Corpus Christi, TX. It was replaced > by U.S.S. Forrestal, redesignated AVT 59 on February 4, 1992, after completing > her last deployment with Carrier Air Wing 6 (CVW 6) from Mayport, FL. She left > in May 1991, and returned that December. The ship entered a complex overhaul > at the Phillidelphia Naval Yard in September 1992, and is scheduled to > complete November, 1993. Most work will be removal of weapons and sensors. So, in the interim, where are the naval aviation candidates (trainees? cadets???) going to learn their carrier landings, since there is currently not AVT available? [mod note -- U.S.S. Forrestal will be serving as the training carrier Steve] James - confused&dazed, but that's nothing new
Re: Carrier info.wanted !
Author: david.r.wells
Date: Tue, 26 Jan 1993 17:39
Date: Tue, 26 Jan 1993 17:39
26 lines
1288 bytes
1288 bytes
From "david.r.wells" <drw@cbnewsg.cb.att.com> In article <C1D89v.9FJ@law7.DaytonOH.NCR.COM> aggie@wealthy.ocean.fsu.edu writes: > >From aggie@wealthy.ocean.fsu.edu > >> >> You missed the Constellation (part of the JFK/Kitty Hawk class) >> >> Midway was on it's way back from Japan to be de-commissioned >> >> Steve] As far as I know, Midway has been decommissioned. > >According to my recollection of one of the posts appearing here, AVT-16 >_Lexington_ has already been decomissioned and scraped. Can anyone >confirm or deny that? > I'll deny it. Lexington has been decommissioned, but thankfully, NOT scrapped. She is now preserved in Texas. David Wells
Re: Carrier info.wanted !
Author: Thomas Richard Hubbard
Date: Tue, 26 Jan 1993 17:42
Date: Tue, 26 Jan 1993 17:42
33 lines
1609 bytes
1609 bytes
From trh2m@kelvin.seas.Virginia.EDU (Thomas Richard Hubbard) In article <C1F6zE.KuB@law7.DaytonOH.NCR.COM> bull@vaxc.cc.monash.edu.au writes: >[mod note -- From all the other posting, here is the "canonical" list >of U.S. Carriers currently being used: > >Ship Class Propulsion >---------- ---------- ----------------- >Forrestal Forrestal Oil (note -- used as training carrier) >Ranger Forrestal Oil >Saratoga Forrestal Oil >Independence Forrestal Oil >JFK JFK/Kitty Hawk Oil >Constellation JFK/Kitty Hawk Oil >America JFK/Kitty Hawk Oil >Kitty Hawk JFK/Kitty Hawk Oil >Enterprise Enterprise Nuclear >Nimitz Nimitz Nuclear >Eisenhower Nimitz Nuclear >Vinson Nimitz Nuclear >Roosevelt Nimitz Nuclear >Lincoln Nimitz Nuclear The USS George Washington was commissioned on Independence Day, '92 at Pier 12, Norolk Naval Base, Norfolk, Va. Tom Hubbard [mod note -- Thanks for the update. Hadn't heard the the GW had been commissioned. STeve[
Re: Carrier info.wanted !
Author: MegaZone
Date: Tue, 26 Jan 1993 17:42
Date: Tue, 26 Jan 1993 17:42
18 lines
1427 bytes
1427 bytes
From MegaZone <megazone@realsoon.wpi.edu> In article <C1F6zE.KuB@law7.DaytonOH.NCR.COM> bull@vaxc.cc.monash.edu.au writes: >> E-3 early warning radar plane hehe... Wow, impressive. :-) Just a correction, that is the E-2 Hawkeye, similar to the C-2 Greyhound. The E-3 Sentry is the 707 based aircraft the press keeps calling the AWACS. (Which annoys me, AWACS is a mission type. The E-2 and E-3 both do it, so have several other aircraft like the EC-121, etc....) ############################################################################### # I have one prejudice, and that is against stupidity. Use your mind, think! # #Email megazone@wpi.wpi.edu Moderator, WPI anime FTP site 130.215.24.1 /anime# ###############################################################################
Re: Carrier info.wanted !
Author: S.C.T. Martin
Date: Tue, 26 Jan 1993 17:45
Date: Tue, 26 Jan 1993 17:45
20 lines
1433 bytes
1433 bytes
From "S.C.T. Martin" <martin@kawa.ssl.fujitsu.co.jp> On 25 Jan 93 17:23:38 GMT, bull@vaxc.cc.monash.edu.au said: bull> England has 3 Invincible class carriers, with no immediate bull> plans for replacing them. All 3 carriers are conventionally powered bull> using turbines. Names: Invincible, Illustrious, ?. The third ship is Ark Royal (Also was the name of their last 'real' carrier). -- _______________________________________________________________________ | S.C.T. Martin | Fujitsu S.S.L. Limited | martin@kawa.ssl.fujitsu.co.jp | |------------------------------------------------------------------------| |------------------------------------------------------------------------| |"The only way to get rid of a temptation is to yield to it"-Oscar Wilde.| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Re: Carrier info.wanted !
Author: ppugliese
Date: Tue, 26 Jan 1993 17:52
Date: Tue, 26 Jan 1993 17:52
32 lines
1979 bytes
1979 bytes
From ppugliese@pimacc.pima.edu > The former Soviet Republics also have a number of carrier-type vessels in > various stages of disrepair. > > 2 x Moskva Class (Moskva and Lenningrad)--very old, close to retirement-- > operate only KA-25/27 helicopters > 4 x Kiev Class (Kiev, Novorosysk, Minsk, Kharkov(?))--early/mid-1970s > ships with ski-jumps for Yak-38 "Forgers" and ASW helos; some > of these are in awful states of repair and need immediate over- > hauls or scrapping The Yak-38 has been withdrawn from service so these ships have no a/c to operate. > 1 x Admrial Kuznetsov--full deck carrier, but I believe it has a ski-jump > as well; operates 40-50 aircraft, Su-27K is main fighter; now > under Russian control > 1 x Varyag--Still under construction, I think under Ukrainian control; > reports last year said it was to be sold to China, but all > parties involved deny it; would need lots of work to get > functional > 1 x ??--nuclear powered carrier under construction? This one has been scrapped incomplete. > 1 x ??--conventional powered carrier under con., like Kuznetsov This one has also been scrapped incomplete.
Re: Carrier info.wanted !
Author: Chad Barret Wemyss
Date: Tue, 26 Jan 1993 17:55
Date: Tue, 26 Jan 1993 17:55
18 lines
1441 bytes
1441 bytes
From Chad Barret Wemyss <chadwemy@wpi.wpi.edu> In article <C1F7BL.LH9@law7.DaytonOH.NCR.COM> TWZ101@psuvm.psu.edu writes: > 1 x Varyag--Still under construction, I think under Ukrainian control; > reports last year said it was to be sold to China, but all > parties involved deny it; would need lots of work to get > functional As far as I have heard, construction is continuing, either for the Ukranian navy or for international sale. The Chinese and the Indians are major customer prospects, despite what either of them might say. Both are in a position of becoming a major world power within the next 20 years, and a nuclear carrier would certainly help national image, if nothing else. Chad Wemyss Worcester Polytechnic Institute
Re: Carrier info.wanted !
Author: Steven.Schultz
Date: Wed, 27 Jan 1993 16:03
Date: Wed, 27 Jan 1993 16:03
32 lines
2009 bytes
2009 bytes
From Steven.Schultz <Steven.Schultz@mixcom.mixcom.com> In <C1F7BL.LH9@law7.DaytonOH.NCR.COM> TWZ101@psuvm.psu.edu writes: > Argentina: 1 (Vienticinco de Mayo) Gone. I can provide operational data if anyone would like it, but the ship was inactive since June 1986. The ship entered AFNE, Rio Santiago, in October 1988, and after some ideas for overall, including new propulsion, the idea was cancelled in October 1991. The ship was decommissioned, stricken, and sold for scrap by May, 1992. > 2 x Moskva Class (Moskva and Lenningrad)--very old, close to retirement-- > operate only KA-25/27 helicopters Only Moskva remains. In fact, there are plans to scrap it, and may have been already. > 4 x Kiev Class (Kiev, Novorosysk, Minsk, Kharkov(?))--early/mid-1970s > ships with ski-jumps for Yak-38 "Forgers" and ASW helos; some > of these are in awful states of repair and need immediate over- > hauls or scrapping Only Kiev and Novorossiysk remain, at Vladivostok. Very bad condition. Will probably be scrapped. The other is Admiral Flota Sovetskogo Soyuza Gorshkov, a modified Kiev-class. It is in Northern Fleet, and the other two may be used for parts. Kuznetsov and Varyag are as stated, but all others not mentioned here I believe have been scrapped or never started. -- Steve Schultz Steven.Schultz@mixcom.com
Re: Carrier info.wanted !
Author: gawne
Date: Wed, 27 Jan 1993 16:07
Date: Wed, 27 Jan 1993 16:07
14 lines
1048 bytes
1048 bytes
From gawne@stsci.edu In article <C1D840.94v@law7.DaytonOH.NCR.COM>, "david.r.wells" <drw@cbnewsg.cb.att.com> gives a laundrylist of carriers including: > UK: 3, Invincible, Illustrious and Ark Royal. Given that these are Harrier and Helo carriers shouldn't we also include the LHA's and the LHD's like Tarawa, Iwo Jima, Pelilieu, and Wasp for the US of A? For that matter how about the LPH's? They're flattops too. -Bill Gawne, Space Telescope Science Institute MSgt USMCR
Re: Carrier info.wanted !
Author: Friedrich BROHS
Date: Wed, 27 Jan 1993 16:07
Date: Wed, 27 Jan 1993 16:07
26 lines
1255 bytes
1255 bytes
From Friedrich BROHS <fbrohs@email.tuwien.ac.at> r tvaxc.cc.monash.edu.au said: r England has 3 Invincible class carriers, with no immediate r plans for replacing them. All 3 carriers are conventionally powered r using turbines. Names: Invincible, Illustrious, ?. The third ship is Ark Royal (Also was the name of their last 'real' carrier). On 25 Jan 93 17:23:38 GMT, bull tkawa.ssl.fujitsu.co.jp from "S.C.T. Martin" I thought they had at least one other carrier they used in tghe Falklands, the HMS HERMES Isn't that right? It should be a rather small carrier with Harriers aboard, but so is the Invincible, too if I remember correctly.
Thread Navigation
This is a paginated view of messages in the thread with full content displayed inline.
Messages are displayed in chronological order, with the original post highlighted in green.
Use pagination controls to navigate through all messages in large threads.
Back to All Threads