Thread View: sci.military
2 messages
2 total messages
Started by Edward J. Rudnicki
Tue, 26 Jan 1993 17:45
Re: Anti-aircraft
Author: Edward J. Rudnicki
Date: Tue, 26 Jan 1993 17:45
Date: Tue, 26 Jan 1993 17:45
42 lines
2615 bytes
2615 bytes
From "Edward J. Rudnicki" (FSAC-SID) <erudnick@pica.army.mil> George Patterson writes: #>I always thought that AA shells were fused to explode at a given al- #>titude. Remember all those movies about B-17s over Germany, and all #>that flak? # #Some are, some aren't. Typically anything under about 40mm is contact #fused. They'd be throwing 88s at a B-17 - it's the only shell that could #get that high. The 8.8cm AA guns were really marginal against the B-17s and B-24s. They were functioning at nearly maximum altitude, the projectiles took a long time to get there, and the lethal volume was (relatively) small. As the bombing campaign went on the Germans introduced a 10.5cm AA gun, which was probably derived from the existing naval mount. Later came a 12.8cm, which indicates a pressing need, as this was never a standard German caliber before. A 15cm gun was in the works when the war ended. The fuzes on the German AA were mechanical time fuzes. The time of flight to various altitudes was known, so when engaging bombers the altitude was determined and the fuze time set accordingly. Obviously a high velocity reduced time of flight and increased accuracy. The Germans were apparently the first to use mechanical time fuzes in large numbers, which were both more accurate and more reliable than pyrotechnic time fuzes such as those used with shrapnel in the Great War. The Allies of course improved on this further by introducing proximity fuzes for AA work. Today, as George states, AA under 40mm uses PD fuzes, while 40mm and up can, and typically does, use proximity fuzes. Most AA fuzes of both types use a self-destruct. Ed Rudnicki erudnick@pica.army.mil All disclaimers apply "War must be looked upon as a business, and subject, like any other business, to business principles. War is the business of destruction of life and property of an enemy.....The most deadly and destructive implements of war are the most humane, and the producers of them may justly be looked upon as humanitarians." ----- Hudson Maxim (the other Maxim)
Re: Anti-aircraft
Author: Harry Bloomberg
Date: Wed, 27 Jan 1993 16:00
Date: Wed, 27 Jan 1993 16:00
16 lines
1071 bytes
1071 bytes
From Harry Bloomberg <hpb@hpb.cis.pitt.edu> In article <C1H2o3.EMM@law7.DaytonOH.NCR.COM> erudnick@pica.army.mil (FSAC-SID) writes: > >The fuzes on the German AA were mechanical time fuzes. The time of flight >to various altitudes was known, so when engaging bombers the altitude was >determined and the fuze time set accordingly. But what would happen when the planes changed altitude to avoid the flak? Did the German gunners need to stop shooting for a while to change to ammunition fused to explode at the new altitude? Harry Bloomberg hpb@vms.cis.pitt.edu
Thread Navigation
This is a paginated view of messages in the thread with full content displayed inline.
Messages are displayed in chronological order, with the original post highlighted in green.
Use pagination controls to navigate through all messages in large threads.
Back to All Threads