Article View: sci.misc
Article #1156Re: TOXIC WASTE - WHAT IS THE SOLUTION?
From: John Budny
Date: Thu, 06 Jun 1996 00:00
Date: Thu, 06 Jun 1996 00:00
59 lines
3200 bytes
3200 bytes
Perhaps I missed something, but I interpreted the original post to imply that the priorities for addressing environmental issues may not in line with their relative seriousness. I must admit that my interpretation may have been slightly influenced by some material that I've been reading from a download I carried out recently on priorities of superfund site attention and in general public policy for regulating health risks. There are two good documents that are worth looking at and they may important to the original post. These may be found and downloaded at: <ftp://cais.com> If you are requested for a password, use your email address. Once at the site, change directory to </pub/milloy> The two files are "choices" and "sbra", which stands for Science Based Risk Assessment. John A. Budny jabudny@earthlink.net Chris Allen <allen.chris.ca@bhp.com.au> wrote: > >Carl Porter <3CAP@MSG.TI.COM> wrote: >>Leon Mar wrote: >>> >>> Hi! >>> >>> I'm doing an essay on toxic waste management, though the subject has >>> interested me extremely. What do you think? >snip >>> >>> Or are there any other solutions to this controversial problem? >>> >>> Thanks, please reply by email if possible. > >snip >> The main problem I can see is that public opinion and politics >>run enviromental protection agencies instead of sound scientific >>investigation. CFCs, acid rain, DDT, asbestos are all examples of public >>opinion being swayed by scientific work that hadn't passed thru the peer >>review and was found to be flawed at a later date. Education, common >>sense and rational thinking instead of blind panic would go a long way >>towards solving our problems. > >Are you saying acid rain and inhaled asbestos fibres are not harmful? > >Please provide peer-reviewed references in support, if this is what you >mean. > >----------------------------------------------- >All opinions here are mine, not my company's. > >Chris Allen allen.chris.ca@bhp.com.au >Senior Project Geologist BHP Steel LPD, Whyalla SA 5600 Australia > >
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<4p74ot$k2@guyana.it.earthlink.net>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<31afa1b6.133609@news.uq.edu.au> <31B48718.30EF@MSG.TI.COM> <4p2jfu$t22@gossamer.itmel.bhp.com.au>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: fcea6,427e459f58f58e0c X-Google-Attributes: gidfcea6,public X-Google-Thread: fbe8c,427e459f58f58e0c X-Google-Attributes: gidfbe8c,public X-Google-Thread: 103efd,427e459f58f58e0c X-Google-Attributes: gid103efd,public X-Google-Thread: 10c480,427e459f58f58e0c X-Google-Attributes: gid10c480,public X-Google-Thread: 10e4d1,427e459f58f58e0c X-Google-Attributes: gid10e4d1,public X-Google-Thread: fdaee,427e459f58f58e0c X-Google-Attributes: gidfdaee,public From: John Budny <jabudny@earthlink.net> Subject: Re: TOXIC WASTE - WHAT IS THE SOLUTION? Date: 1996/06/06 Message-ID: <4p74ot$k2@guyana.it.earthlink.net> X-Deja-AN: 158811125 references: <31afa1b6.133609@news.uq.edu.au> <31B48718.30EF@MSG.TI.COM> <4p2jfu$t22@gossamer.itmel.bhp.com.au> content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii organization: Earthlink Network, Inc. mime-version: 1.0 newsgroups: sci.misc,aus.environment.conservation,aus.environment.misc,bionet.toxicology,sci.engr.safety,sci.research x-mailer: Mozilla 1.2N (Windows; I; 16bit)