Article View: sci.misc
Article #1159Re: TOXIC WASTE - WHAT IS THE SOLUTION?
From: system
Date: Fri, 07 Jun 1996 00:00
Date: Fri, 07 Jun 1996 00:00
65 lines
3471 bytes
3471 bytes
Alan \"Uncle Al\" Schwartz <uncleal0@ix.netcom.com> writes:
>There will always be toxic waste - industrial, radiological, biological,
>medical, and whatnot.
agreed
>Incineration has the wonderful advantage (except for radiological waste,
>of course) of reducing volume by 90+% and leaving nothing but inorganics,
>plus producing co-generation energy to help pay for itself. Exhaust
>scrubbing technology is mature. Build the things on the coast where the
>prevailing winds are out to sea. The solution to pollution is dilution
>(as long as the objectionable species are reactive - not polychlorinated
>hydrocarbons or aromatics).
Eagles and birds of prey along the Great Lakes have a very hard time
reproducing because of (among other things) Cl compounds that get
taken up by the fish they eat...
I want to see the data that suggest that the amount of dilution you
are providing is adequate... and regulations/taxes that encourage
reduction of the wastes in the first place.
>Add a designated national landfill out in the desiccated middle of
>nowhere, dug deep and huge, perhaps lined with geotextile for drainage
>control. You cannot avoid waste, but you can redcue it, corral it and
>put it in one place with a big sign: If You Enter Here You Will Die.
>Sacrifce 100 square miles of desert to preserve the other 7,686,748
>square miles of the Commonwealth of Australia. It makes sense to me.
>(And the leachate from the ash and other stuff, if any, might be rich
>enough in strategic metals to be worht mining.)
>An alternative is the US model: 30,000+ waste dumps, 2500 SuperFund
>sites (and about 150 "remediated" to date), illegal dumping, and massive
>contamination.
The above is a result of companies that don't give a sh*t and poor national
planning
>about $10 billion in litigation,
politics
>Environmentalist hysteria...
politics and a fairly natural result of history
>Environmentalism is that philosophy and dialectic in direct opposition
>to progress in its every form
Bullshit.
There are environmentalists with that viewpoint, there are industrialists
who see nothing wrong with causing cancer/asthma attacks... making a
profit regardless of the costs to others
>Mediocrity is a vice of the doomed.
Huh?
>Alan "Uncle Al" Schwartz
>UncleAl0@ix.netcom.com ("zero" before @)
>http://www.netprophet.co.nz/uncleal/
> (Toxic URL! Hazardous to children, Liberals, and most mammals.)
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<4p9jso$sgg@corn.cso.niu.edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<31afa1b6.133609@news.uq.edu.au>,<4oqhgc$qud@sjx-ixn3.ix.netcom.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: fcea6,427e459f58f58e0c X-Google-Attributes: gidfcea6,public X-Google-Thread: fbe8c,427e459f58f58e0c X-Google-Attributes: gidfbe8c,public X-Google-Thread: 103efd,427e459f58f58e0c X-Google-Attributes: gid103efd,public X-Google-Thread: 10e4d1,427e459f58f58e0c X-Google-Attributes: gid10e4d1,public X-Google-Thread: fdaee,427e459f58f58e0c X-Google-Attributes: gidfdaee,public X-Google-Thread: 10c480,427e459f58f58e0c X-Google-Attributes: gid10c480,public From: system@niuhep.phys.niu.edu Subject: Re: TOXIC WASTE - WHAT IS THE SOLUTION? Date: 1996/06/07 Message-ID: <4p9jso$sgg@corn.cso.niu.edu> X-Deja-AN: 158976745 references: <31afa1b6.133609@news.uq.edu.au>,<4oqhgc$qud@sjx-ixn3.ix.netcom.com> organization: NIU Physics Dept. reply-to: system@niuhep.phys.niu.edu newsgroups: sci.misc,aus.environment.conservation,aus.environment.misc,bionet.toxicology,sci.engr.safety,sci.research