Re: Solar Collection/Fresnel lenses

Article View: sci.misc

Article #44

#44

From: John Schuch
Date: Mon, 13 Apr 1992 19:00

11 lines
898 bytes

In article <1992Apr8.195550.7020@hamblin.math.byu.edu> richard@ee.byu.edu (Richard Christensen) writes:
>[stuff deleted]
>Edmund Scientific told me that the only thing that mattered was
>the number of lines per inch.  The lower the better (counter-intuitive
>isn't it).  

Not really if you consider the optimum would be a large regular lens
of the same diameter, that would have 0 lines. ( or 1 depending on
how you look at it )

John

Technical Details

Message-ID: <1992Apr13.190032.12876@phx.mcd.mot.com>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!decwrl!infopiz!lupine!motcsd!udc!mcdphx!hbg6

References: <1992Apr8.195550.7020@hamblin.math.byu.edu>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!decwrl!infopiz!lupine!motcsd!udc!mcdphx!hbg6
Newsgroups: sci.misc
Subject: Re: Solar Collection/Fresnel lenses
Message-ID: <1992Apr13.190032.12876@phx.mcd.mot.com>
From: hbg6@phx.mcd.mot.com (John Schuch)
Date: 13 Apr 92 19:00:32 GMT
Sender: news@phx.mcd.mot.com
References: <1992Apr8.195550.7020@hamblin.math.byu.edu>
Organization: Motorola Computer Group, Tempe, Az.
Nntp-Posting-Host: qis1.phx.mcd.mot.com
Lines: 11

Reply to Parent Message