Article View: sci.misc
Article #51Re: "Magnetizer Fuel Energizer"
From: JOSEPH T CHEW
Date: Mon, 10 Aug 1992 15:48
Date: Mon, 10 Aug 1992 15:48
75 lines
4783 bytes
4783 bytes
>We acquired a leaflet about this at the local shopping centre (Cameron >Toll), stuck under the windscreen wiper. I guess the page charges for Physical Review are too much for these misunderstood geniuses whose renegade ideas are too revolutionary to make them employable at universities and laboratories. >It claims to be "..a highly effective , easy to install fuel saving >device, created through the technology of Magneto Hydro Dynamics (MHD). >It will enhance your engine's performance and reduce exhaust emissions." > >Allegedly it works by aligning hydrocarbon molecules in a concentrated >magnetic field. (What is the magnetic moment of petrol (gas) anyway?). >This alignment creates a more effective fuel/air mixture. > >Apparently it can increase efficiency by 15 to 20 %. (There must be a >massive conspiracy by fuel processors and sellers to keep this >information from us:-) Just think how much money could be saved if you >got an extra tank of petrol for every six you bought :-). ) > >Seriously, anyone care to tear this to shreds, in words that a literate >non scientist can understand? I'm not sure I can stop laughing long enough to recall the details of what I posted to rec.autos the last time a similar device came up. That one did not invoke MHD; instead, it claimed to make the molecules, presumably of gasolinium, "heat-seeking," which I suppose implies that they were getting their snake oil from pit vipers. It's a variation on the general theme of "cow magnets." Remember those, from the depths of the second Arab oil embargo? (Which may not have been its first time around, but I don't recall the earlier occasions.) Anyway, cow magnets have a legitimate use -- in dairying and ranching. Some idiot-savant decided to expose his carburetor to their mysterious magnetic field and perceived an increase in his gas mileage. Mystified feed-store proprietors were cleaned out of the things within weeks by people who had never come closer to a cow than at McDonald's. Anyway, the LEAST of the arguments against this nonsense is what happens in the creation and subsequent fate of the air/fuel mixture. Aligning molecules -- what on earth good would that do anyway? Mixing isn't a chemical reaction! Anyway, it would be a lot like aligning perfume molecules before releasing them into a thunderstorm. Or aligning your hair before going down the Tower o' Death Water Slide at the amusement park. One car maker (Honda?) even used to brag about its "High Swirl" combustion chamber, which tells you a bit about what's going on. All you're doing in carburetion is blowing about one part gasoline (at the level of tiny droplets, I believe, not molecules) into about 16 parts air and mixing it up as homogeneously as possible before the spark. There are a lot more details, of course, but... aligning the molecules? Sheesh. There's also the simple "follow the money -- always follow the money" argument. Car makers spend millions upon millions of <currency unit> trying to squeeze out a little more gas mileage without compromising performance, room, and other things that consumers demand. If these magnetic gizmos (which, as you've gathered, have been kicking around for years in one form or another) could help, wouldn't the manufacturers be all over them like white on rice? (Those who think the car makers, oil companies, and Rothschild/Zionist/House-of-Windsor dope cartel are involved in a monstrous conspiracy to suppress 150-mpg carburetors may proceed to alt.conspiracy at this time.) I have to get back to my "day job." Maybe if time permits I'll try to dope out just how they expect their little magnet to align the molecules in the first place. (The NMR literature would be a good starting point for a real scorched-earth debunking of this device.) Meanwhile, rest assured that the device is of more interest to the bunko squad and the consumer-protection bureau than to automotive engineers. Joe Not speaking for LBL or the Department of Energy (though something tells me neither of them would be inclined to disagree...)
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<25350@dog.ee.lbl.gov>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!cis.ohio-state.edu!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!cs.utexas.edu!sun-barr!ames!agate!dog.ee.lbl.gov!csa3.lbl.gov!jtchewReferences:
<24646@castle.ed.ac.uk>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!cis.ohio-state.edu!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!cs.utexas.edu!sun-barr!ames!agate!dog.ee.lbl.gov!csa3.lbl.gov!jtchew From: jtchew@csa3.lbl.gov (JOSEPH T CHEW) Newsgroups: sci.misc Subject: Re: "Magnetizer Fuel Energizer" Date: 10 Aug 92 15:48:42 GMT Organization: Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory - Berkeley, CA, USA Lines: 75 Message-ID: <25350@dog.ee.lbl.gov> References: <24646@castle.ed.ac.uk> Reply-To: jtchew@csa3.lbl.gov NNTP-Posting-Host: 128.3.254.198 Summary: Claims to increase fuel performance by magnetizing it. Keywords: Pseudo Science Alert News-Software: VAX/VMS VNEWS 1.3-4