Re: Why There Are No Black Holes

Article View: sci.misc

Article #666

#666

From: William Linden
Date: Sat, 02 Jan 1988 03:10

7 lines
801 bytes

All right, it looks like my turn to object. What does all this physics
controversy have to do with talk.religion.newage?
-- 
Will Linden                          {sun,philabs,cmcl2}!phri\
Compuserve  72737,2150                 {bellcore,cmcl2}!cucard!dasys1!wlinden
MCI Mail   WLINDEN         {portal,well,ihnp4,amdahl}!hoptoad/

Technical Details

Message-ID: <2429@dasys1.UUCP>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!mnetor!uunet!husc6!cmcl2!phri!dasys1!wlinden

References: <2337@dasys1.UUCP> <395b7bf6.805@hi-csc.UUCP> <2420@dasys1.UUCP>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!mnetor!uunet!husc6!cmcl2!phri!dasys1!wlinden
From: wlinden@dasys1.UUCP (William Linden)
Newsgroups: sci.misc,talk.religion.newage
Subject: Re: Why There Are No Black Holes
Message-ID: <2429@dasys1.UUCP>
Date: 2 Jan 88 03:10:31 GMT
References: <2337@dasys1.UUCP> <395b7bf6.805@hi-csc.UUCP> <2420@dasys1.UUCP>
Reply-To: wlinden@dasys1.UUCP (William Linden)
Followup-To: sci.misc
Distribution: na
Organization: The Big Electric Cat
Lines: 7

Reply to Parent Message