Article View: sci.misc
Article #744Re: Omni-Americans
From: Ethan Tecumseh Vishniac
Date: Thu, 03 Mar 1988 15:01
Date: Thu, 03 Mar 1988 15:01
16 lines
1184 bytes
1184 bytes
In article <5017@uwmcsd1.UUCP>, markh@csd4.milw.wisc.edu (Mark William Hopkins) writes:
> Read Omni instead of Scientific American. It's much better because it has
> all things Futuristic in it, be they science fact or science fiction (i.e.
> science yet-to-be-fact).
I have read, and enjoyed many pieces of fiction in Omni. A few of them
even had a note attached indicating that they were fiction.
I have read Omni cover to cover a couple of times. I found *damn* little
science.
--
I'm not afraid of dying Ethan Vishniac, Dept of Astronomy
I just don't want to be {charm,ut-sally,ut-ngp,noao}!utastro!ethan
there when it happens. (arpanet) ethan@astro.AS.UTEXAS.EDU
- Woody Allen (bitnet) ethan%astro.as.utexas.edu@CUNYVM.CUNY.EDU
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1058@ut-emx.UUCP>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!mnetor!uunet!lll-winken!lll-tis!ames!mailrus!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!ut-sally!ut-emx!ethanReferences:
<5017@uwmcsd1.UUCP>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!mnetor!uunet!lll-winken!lll-tis!ames!mailrus!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!ut-sally!ut-emx!ethan From: ethan@ut-emx.UUCP (Ethan Tecumseh Vishniac) Newsgroups: sci.misc Subject: Re: Omni-Americans Message-ID: <1058@ut-emx.UUCP> Date: 3 Mar 88 15:01:16 GMT References: <5017@uwmcsd1.UUCP> Organization: The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas Lines: 15 Summary: Omni?????