Re: Support Scientific American

Article View: sci.misc

Article #762

#762

From: Dan Tilque
Date: Wed, 09 Mar 1988 08:44

15 lines
1118 bytes

In article <2495@orca.TEK.COM> brucec@orca.UUCP (Bruce Cohen) writes:
>	I've read occasional
>issues of the other popular science magazines, and rate them terrible
>(Omni - no factual content to speak of, and a horrible tendency to
>National Enquirism) to mediocre (Discover - not enough technical
>sophistication).

Perhaps it's not considered "popular", but I consider Science News to be
the best general science magazine around.  Of course, it has a slightly
different purpose than Scientific American, so subscribing to both SN and
SA would not be a bad idea.  

---
Dan Tilque  --  dant@mrloog.LA.TEK.COM

Technical Details

Message-ID: <3229@zeus.TEK.COM>

Path:

arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!mnetor!uunet!husc6!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!uwmcsd1!leah!itsgw!batcomputer!cornell!uw-beaver!tektronix!zeus!amadeus!rob

References: <2495@orca.TEK.COM>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!mnetor!uunet!husc6!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!uwmcsd1!leah!itsgw!batcomputer!cornell!uw-beaver!tektronix!zeus!amadeus!rob
From: rob@amadeus.TEK.COM (Dan Tilque)
Newsgroups: sci.misc
Subject: Re: Support Scientific American
Message-ID: <3229@zeus.TEK.COM>
Date: 9 Mar 88 08:44:12 GMT
References: <2495@orca.TEK.COM>
Sender: news@zeus.TEK.COM
Reply-To: dant@mrloog.LA.TEK.COM (Dan Tilque)
Organization: Tektronix, Inc., Beaverton,  OR.
Lines: 15
Summary: Try Science News

Reply to Parent Message