Article View: sci.misc
Article #85Re: Whale killing - other animals
From: Hans DU BUF
Date: Wed, 29 Jul 1992 09:36
Date: Wed, 29 Jul 1992 09:36
36 lines
2669 bytes
2669 bytes
In article <1992Jul28.184456.2733@blaze.cs.jhu.edu>, arromdee@jyusenkyou.cs.jhu.edu (Ken Arromdee) writes: |> In article <1992Jul28.124428@sicsun.epfl.ch> dubuf@sicsun.epfl.ch (Hans DU BUF) writes: |> >Yesterday I read in my Dutch newspaper (NRC/Handelsblad) that an |> >initiative has led to the collection of 2,500,000 signatures from 63 |> >countries agaist Spanish bullfights, and that these have been offered to |> >some Spanish representative. |> |> Isn't this attempting to impose your culture on someone else? |> -- Yep, so what (apart from the fact that many Spanish people don't like it themselves). Like "intellectuals" (I hate this word) should take their responsability in TRYING to suppress stupid habits in their own country, there exists the same responsability between countries. Of course, I am sometimes too optimistic, look only what happens in Turkey, the most disgusting country in the NATO, to people instead of to just animals. What a shame, and that's only one example. Also, responding to the reply from Frommert who started this discussion and who wants to keep a special status for whales because of their intelligence in contrast to bulls: I think that mankind, after I don't know how many millennia of intellectual evolution (don't laugh, I know it is ridiculous), has to decide to respect nature and to keep their hands off all animals including their biotopes. The question is then where to put the limit if any: for example, horses may be more intelligent than cows and are not consumed in many countries, but there are at least no horse- fights as far as I know and the killing is hidden away in slaughterhouses. I don't want to continue this discussion because of the many political and cultural aspects involved, not to speak off ethical aspects. Apart from intelligence, which I don't accept as the only valid argument, there are no reasons to kill whales. All products have substitutes now, and they can eat as much krill as they want, whatever the consequences for our fishing industry. And if the Norwegian government is fooled by the industrial lobby, we have also to attack that industry: boycott!
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1992Jul29.113612@sicsun.epfl.ch>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!wupost!gumby!yale!yale.edu!ira.uka.de!chx400!sicsun!sicsun.epfl.ch!dubufReferences:
<1992Jul28.124428@sicsun.epfl.ch> <1992Jul28.184456.2733@blaze.cs.jhu.edu>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!wupost!gumby!yale!yale.edu!ira.uka.de!chx400!sicsun!sicsun.epfl.ch!dubuf From: dubuf@sicsun.epfl.ch (Hans DU BUF) Newsgroups: sci.misc Subject: Re: Whale killing - other animals Keywords: disgusting Message-ID: <1992Jul29.113612@sicsun.epfl.ch> Date: 29 Jul 92 09:36:12 GMT References: <1992Jul28.124428@sicsun.epfl.ch> <1992Jul28.184456.2733@blaze.cs.jhu.edu> Sender: news@sicsun.epfl.ch Organization: Ecole Polytechnique Federale de Lausanne Lines: 36