🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

2 total messages Started by Dave Newkirk Mon, 02 May 1988 14:18
Biggest Cities and Wealth
#1079
Author: Dave Newkirk
Date: Mon, 02 May 1988 14:18
31 lines
1567 bytes
In Isaac Asimov's science fact article in the June '88 issue of Fantasy
and Science Fiction, this table of the 16 largest cities in the world
was offered along with some observations.

Asimov says before WWII, London was first with 8 million and New York second
at 7m.  London has actually decreased due to growth in its suburbs, while
NY has maintained its numbers.

 1. Mexico City, Mexico		13,000,000
 2. Sao Paulo, Brazil		12,600,000
 3. Shanghai, China		12,000,000
 4. Cairo, Egypt		12,000,000
 5. Seoul, South Korea	 	9,600,000
 6. Peking, China		 9,300,000
 7. Calcutta, India		 9,200,000
 8. Rio de Janeiro, Brazil	 9,000,000
 9. Tokyo, Japan		 8,500,000
10. Bombay, India		 8,300,000
11. Moscow, U.S.S.R		 8,000,000
12. Tientsin, China		 7,900,000
13. Jakarta, Indonesia	 	7,700,000
14. New York, U.S.A		 7,200,000
15. Canton, China		 6,800,000
16. London, U.K.		 6,700,000

He also says NY is still the richest large city, and the large cities in
non-industrial counties tend to include many square miles of small shacks
where people live in very poor conditions (which other city dwellers may
not recognize as a city).
-- 
				Dave Newkirk, ihnp4!ihlpm!dcn
Re: Biggest Cities and Wealth
#1084
Author: Craig Werner
Date: Tue, 03 May 1988 19:53
33 lines
1884 bytes
In article <1866@ihlpm.ATT.COM>, dcn@ihlpm.ATT.COM (Dave Newkirk) writes:
> In Isaac Asimov's science fact article in the June '88 issue of Fantasy
> and Science Fiction, this table of the 16 largest cities in the world
> was offered along with some observations.
> 
>  3. Shanghai, China		12,000,000
> 14. New York, U.S.A		 7,200,000
> 
> 				Dave Newkirk, ihnp4!ihlpm!dcn

Yes, there is the distinction between city and metropolitan area.  I only
picked these two examples because this is coming from several years ago
when Shanghai was still the number one populated city, with about 10.5 
million people.  The square mileage of the city of Shanghai is actually
quite huge compared to the actual urban area.  On the other hand, the
urban areas of New York City do not end at the city limits.  At the time,
about 1982, this meant that the actual population of the two metropolitan
areas was about
	New York 16,000,000
	Shanghai  6,000,000

	There is an interesting sidelight to this, and the scenario goes
like this.  If built up to the population density of New York City, the
entire world's population would fit into the state of New Jersey, all
five billion of them. 

~.

-- 
	        Craig Werner   (future MD/PhD, 3.5 years down, 3.5 to go)
	     werner@aecom.YU.EDU -- Albert Einstein College of Medicine
              (1935-14E Eastchester Rd., Bronx NY 10461, 212-931-2517)
                      "If I don't see you soon, I'll see you later."
Thread Navigation

This is a paginated view of messages in the thread with full content displayed inline.

Messages are displayed in chronological order, with the original post highlighted in green.

Use pagination controls to navigate through all messages in large threads.

Back to All Threads